Search Results for "Section 41-A notice"

123 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 123 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows SFC's Claim for Priority Over Central Excise Dues in Recovery from Borrower's Assets. State Financial Corporation's Statutory Charge Under Section 29 of SFC Act, 1951 Prevails Over Crown Debt Under Central Excise Act, 1944.

The petitioner, SICOM Ltd., a State Financial Corporation established under the State Financial Corporations Act, 1951, advanced a term loan of Rs. 51...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Cancels Bail of Accused in Tiger Poaching Case Under Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 — Accused Found to Be Financier and Key Link in Transnational Wildlife Trafficking.

The State of Maharashtra (Forest Department) filed an application under Section 439(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 seeking cancellation of ba...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside Anticipatory Bail in Corruption Case Involving IRS Officer. High Court's Order Quashed for Failing to Consider Gravity of Offence Under Section 7 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The case arises from two criminal appeals filed by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) and the complainant, Rupesh Balwantbhai Brambhatt, agains...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Removal of Trustees for Mismanagement of Public Trust. Trustees Failed to Maintain Accounts and Misappropriated Trust Funds, Violating Sections 41A, 41D, 50 of Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950.

The case involves two writ petitions filed against the order of the Joint Charity Commissioner, Nagpur, dated 30th June 2003, removing the trustees of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Predeposit Order in Central Excise Valuation Dispute. CESTAT's direction to deposit Rs. 1 crore set aside as assessee had strong prima facie case on valuation under Section 4 of Central Excise Act, 1944.

The appellant, Jabil Circuit India Private Limited, is a manufacturer of set-top boxes. It sold these boxes to Thomson Holdings India Private Limited ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Daughter's Appeal in Property Dispute, Upholds Eviction Decree. Daughter's claim of ownership and tenancy rights in suit flat rejected as she failed to prove independent title or landlord's consent.

The case involves two appeals arising from property disputes over Flat No. 9, Matru Chhaya Building, Marine Drive, Mumbai. The appellant, Ms. Smita P....