Search Results for "Section 222"

585 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 585 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Impleadment of Promoter in Co-operative Dispute Under Section 94(3)(c) MCS Act. Co-operative Court's Power to Implead Parties Is Not Restricted to Persons Enumerated Under Section 91(1)(a) to (e) and Includes Necessary Parties for Effective Adjudication.

The petitioners, members of Bramha Suncity Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., filed Dispute No.106/2021 before the Co-operative Court under the Mahara...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO. 8123 OF 2019

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Concurrent Findings of Readiness and Willingness Upheld. Agreement to Sell dated 28.05.2012 for Rs.2,89,000/- with Rs.2,00,000/- Earnest Money Enforced as Plaintiff Proved Continuous Readiness and Willingness.

The plaintiff-respondent filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell dated 28.05.2012, whereby the defendants-appellants agreed to s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Anticipatory Bail Plea of Former Finance Minister in INX Media Money Laundering Case. Custodial Interrogation Required Under PMLA as Allegations of FIPB Clearance Irregularities and Receipt of Proceeds of Crime Are Serious.

The Supreme Court dismissed an appeal by P. Chidambaram, former Finance Minister, against the Delhi High Court's refusal to grant anticipatory bail in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Suit Barred by Limitation and Res Judicata. Appellants' challenge to 1965 acquisition notification filed in 1992 held time-barred under Article 58 of Limitation Act, 1963 and earlier writ petition dismissal operates as res judicata.

The appellants, original plaintiffs, filed a suit in 1992 seeking declaration of title and permanent injunction in respect of two suit properties bear...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals in MCOC Act Case Due to Lack of Sufficient Material and Non-Application of Mind in Granting Approval and Sanction. Appellants Discharged Under Section 227 CrPC as Material on Record Did Not Warrant Framing of Charge Under MCOC Act.

The present appeals were filed by Sachin Bansilal Ghaiwal and Umesh Mohan Kirve, who were accused Nos. 3 and 9 respectively in a case registered under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Court holds that no substantial question of law arises when findings are based on appreciation of evidence and not perverse.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the original defendants (appellants) against the judgment and decree of the first appellate court which con...