Search Results for "Sale Instances"

521 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 521 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Bank's Illegal Dispossession of Auction Purchaser. Petitioner Purchased Flat in 2017 Auction by SBI, but Was Forcibly Evicted by Saraswat Bank in 2025 Without Due Process.

The petitioners, Mariyam Rangwala and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court at Bo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Appeals in Land Acquisition Case for Percolation Tank Construction. Market Value of Agricultural Land Fixed at Rs. 1,00,000 per Acre with Statutory Benefits Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The case involves two first appeals filed under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, challenging the award dated 18.02.2008 passed by the Ref...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Order in Final Decree Proceedings — Court Holds That Application Under Section 151 CPC Read with Sections 3 and 4 of the Partition Act for Considering Earlier Applications Is Maintainable and Not Barred by Res Judicata.

The writ petition was filed by the petitioners (Mukunda Rao and Venkatesh Rao) challenging the order dated 25.10.2021 passed by the Principal Senior C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Seeking Enhanced Compensation in Land Acquisition Case — Market Value Fixed at Rs.25,000 per Hectare Based on Comparable Sale Instance. Claimant Failed to Prove Higher Market Value Despite Claim of Rs.50,000 per Hectare Under Section 18 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The appellant, Anand Tukaram Banmare, was the owner of agricultural land bearing Survey No.362 admeasuring 2.12 H.R. at Mouza Jamb, Tahsil Samudrapur,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Claim for Enhanced Compensation in Land Acquisition Reference for Municipal Market and Housing. Claimant failed to prove inadequacy of compensation awarded by SLAO under Section 18 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The case is a Land Acquisition Reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, filed by the claimant, Pundalik Raghunath Mahulkar, seeki...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Reverses Land Acquisition Compensation Judgment and Remands for Fresh Consideration with Additional Evidence. Court directs Reference Court to admit copies of depositions, valuation report, and sale instances as additional evidence before deciding claim afresh.

The case arises from a land acquisition matter where the appellant, Laxman s/o Kisan Haste, filed First Appeal No.942 of 2008 against the State and an...