Search Results for "SRA order set aside"

181 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 181 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Slum Dweller for Profiteering from Slum Rehabilitation Tenement. Illegal Transfer and Commercial Use of Residential Premises Under Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971 Upheld Eviction.

The petitioner, Rajendra R. Vishwakarma, was a slum dweller who received tenement no. 104 in 'A' wing of New Prabhat Cooperative Housing Society Ltd, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision in Slum Property Dispute — City Civil Court Has Jurisdiction. Court holds that suit for declaration and injunction regarding slum premises is not barred by Section 28 of Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971, as the bar applies only to eviction suits.

The case involves two Civil Revision Applications challenging an order dated 23/07/2012 passed by the learned Judge of the City Civil Court, Greater M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Eviction Notice Under Slum Act — Petitioner Failed to Show Cause. Petitioner did not respond to show cause notice under Section 33 of Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971, making writ petition premature.

The petitioner, Ashok Mahadeo Palvankar, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging a notice dated 2.12.2004 issued under Section 33 o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Sections 14 and 17 of Maharashtra Slum Act in Land Acquisition Challenge. Challenge to Acquisition Under Section 14 and Award Under Section 17 Rejected as Provisions Held Intra Vires Constitution.

The petitioners, Nenshi Monji (Bombay), a Family Trust and Others, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the acquisi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes NCLT Approval and NCLAT Judgment in Bhushan Power CIRP, Remands for Fresh Resolution Plan. Approved Plan Set Aside Due to Inordinate Delay, Illegal Extension Clause, Waterfall Violation, and Non-Compliance with IBC Provisions Including Sections 30, 31, and 53.

The Supreme Court adjudicated a batch of civil appeals under Section 62 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) challenging the approval of ...