Search Results for "Regulation 20(5)"

209 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 209 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC020054492024_1

The petitioner, Smt. Baligar Chandbi, was appointed as a contract Accountant at Raitha Samparka Kendra, Huvinahadagali, through an outsourcing agency ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Decides Revenue's Wealth Tax Appeals Involving Definition of 'Assets'. The Appeals Challenge ITAT Orders Regarding Assessment Years 1999-2000 to 2004-05 under Section 2(ea) of Wealth Tax Act, 1957.

The High Court of Karnataka heard a batch of Wealth Tax Appeals filed by the Revenue under Section 27-A of the Wealth Tax Act, 1957, against the order...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Municipal Corporation's Petition, Restores Eviction Orders Against Tenants for Subletting Under Section 105-B of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888. Tenants failed to prove lawful occupation of alleged subtenants, burden of proof not discharged.

The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM) filed a writ petition challenging a common judgment and order dated 31st December 2008 passed by th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010069912016_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Karnataka On-Demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016. Petitioners Allege Rules Are Ultra Vires Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Violate Fundamental Rights.

The writ petitions arose from the notification of the Karnataka On-Demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016, by the State Government o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Pronounces Order on Constitutional Challenge to Karnataka On-demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016. Petitioners Assert Rules Ultra Vires Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Violative of Freedom of Trade and Commerce Under Articles 14, 19(1)(g), and 301 of the Constitution.

The Karnataka High Court considered a batch of writ petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the Karnataka On-demand Transportation Techno...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Considers Appeal Against Admission of Coffee Day Enterprises to CIRP Under Section 7 of Insolvency Code. Appeal Raises Questions on the Validity of Debenture Trustee's Action and Limitation Period Based on Debenture Trust Deed Provisions.

The appeal arose from an order of the NCLT Bengaluru Bench admitting Coffee Day Enterprises Limited (the corporate debtor) into Corporate Insolvency R...