Search Results for "Rape Conviction"

1025 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1025 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Gang Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(2)(g) IPC set aside as prosecutrix's testimony was unreliable and medical evidence did not support the prosecution case.

The appellant, Amol Meshram, was convicted by the 7th Assistant Sessions Judge, Nagpur in Sessions Trial No.208/1998 for an offence punishable under S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape and Abduction Case Due to Unreliable Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376 IPC Set Aside as Prosecutrix's Evidence Was Inconsistent and Medical Evidence Did Not Support Rape Allegation.

The case involves two criminal appeals arising from Sessions Case No. 69 of 2008 before the Additional Sessions Judge, Hingoli. The appellant in Crimi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Reduces Sentence of Uncle Convicted for Rape of Niece Due to Special Reasons and Pre-amendment Provision. Conviction under Section 376(1) IPC Upheld but Sentence Reduced from 7 to 5 Years with Compensation of Rs.1,00,000 to Victim.

The appellant, Umesh Tulshiram Kolhe, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Khamgaon, for offences under Sections 376(1) and 506 of the Indi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Rape and Abduction Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Unproven Age of Victim. Consensual Relationship Not Rape Under Sections 366 and 376 IPC.

The appellant, B. Suresh, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court-II, Raichur, for offences under Sections 366 and 376 of the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Upholds Conviction of Accused for Rape of Minor Domestic Worker, Dismisses Cross-Appeals. Testimony of Prosecutrix and Circumstantial Evidence Found Sufficient Under Section 376 IPC Despite Hostile Witness and No DNA Test.

The prosecution case involved a minor maid servant (Ms. X) who was employed by Accused No. 2 in Mumbai and was sexually assaulted by Accused No. 1, th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Gang Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(2)(g) IPC Set Aside as Prosecutrix's Testimony Found Unreliable and Medical Evidence Not Supporting Prosecution Case.

The appellant, Ashpak Lalmohammad Mohammad Ansari, was convicted under Section 376(2)(g) of the Indian Penal Code for gang rape and sentenced to ten y...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Gang Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(2)(g) IPC Set Aside as Prosecutrix's Evidence Found Unreliable and Medical Evidence Did Not Support Allegations.

The case involves three criminal appeals filed by appellants Pratik, Sudesh, Prithviraj, Munna, and Chhotu against their convictions by the Assistant ...