Search Results for "Non-application of Mind"

334 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 334 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Externment Order Under Section 56(1) of Bombay Police Act, 1951 for Non-Application of Mind. Mere Registration of Four Criminal Cases Does Not Justify Externment Without Subjective Satisfaction.

The petitioner, Zubair Shah, filed a criminal writ petition challenging an externment order dated 18th March 2013 passed by the Sub Divisional Magistr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Section 111 CrPC Show Cause Notices for Lack of Subjective Satisfaction and Non-Application of Mind. Show cause notices issued under Section 111 CrPC based on FIRs without recording subjective satisfaction and without disclosing grounds are invalid and liable to be quashed.

The petitioners, Farhan Nasir Khan and Jhanzeb Amir Kamal Khan @ Guddu Pathan, filed two criminal writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Executing Court Order for Non-Application of Mind in Decree Satisfaction Dispute. Remands Matter for Fresh Consideration of Adjustment Principles Under Civil Procedure Code.

The petitioner, M/s Shyam Builders, the original decree holder, challenged the order dated 15.12.2001 passed by the Executing Court in Special Darkhas...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Orders in Red Sanders Smuggling Case — Failure to Consider Less Restrictive Alternatives. Detention under Section 3(1) of COFEPOSA set aside as detaining authority did not consider whether bail conditions or other measures would suffice.

The Bombay High Court allowed two habeas corpus petitions challenging preventive detention orders dated 21 February 2013 issued under Section 3(1) of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Administrative Tribunal Order in Land Revenue Appeal — Failure to Consider Evidence and Lack of Jurisdiction. The Tribunal's order was set aside for non-application of mind and jurisdictional error under the Land Revenue Code.

The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Bombay at Goa, seeking to quash an order...