Bombay High Court Quashes Externment Order Under Section 56(1) of Bombay Police Act, 1951 for Non-Application of Mind. Mere Registration of Four Criminal Cases Does Not Justify Externment Without Subjective Satisfaction.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 6
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Zubair Shah, filed a criminal writ petition challenging an externment order dated 18th March 2013 passed by the Sub Divisional Magistrate, Jalna, under Section 56(1) of the Bombay Police Act, 1951. The order was confirmed by the Secretary (Special) Home Department, Government of Maharashtra. The petitioner carried an appeal against the order, which was dismissed. The court examined the proceedings and noted that only four criminal cases were cited against the petitioner: Crime Nos. 3027/2008, 3036/2008, and two others. The court observed that the externment order was passed without proper application of mind. The authority did not record any subjective satisfaction that the petitioner's movements were causing harm or danger to the public. The court held that mere registration of cases is insufficient to justify externment; there must be credible material to support the order. Consequently, the court quashed the externment order and allowed the petition.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Externment - Section 56(1) Bombay Police Act, 1951 - Validity of Externment Order - The petitioner challenged an externment order passed by the Sub Divisional Magistrate, Jalna, confirmed by the Secretary (Home Department). The court found that the order was passed without proper application of mind as only four cases were cited without any material to show that the petitioner's movements were causing harm or danger. Held that mere registration of cases does not justify externment; the authority must record subjective satisfaction based on credible material (Paras 1-3).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the externment order passed under Section 56(1) of the Bombay Police Act, 1951 was valid and based on proper application of mind

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court quashed the externment order dated 18th March 2013 passed by the Sub Divisional Magistrate, Jalna, and allowed the criminal writ petition.

Law Points

  • Externment order under Section 56(1) Bombay Police Act
  • 1951 requires subjective satisfaction based on material
  • mere registration of cases insufficient
  • non-application of mind vitiates order
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2013 LawText (BOM) (11) 8

Criminal Writ Petition No.601/2013

2013-11-18

K.U. Chandiwala, M.T. Joshi

Mr. M.A. Latif for Petitioner; Mr. M.M. Neralikar, APP for State

Zubair Shah s/o Basit Shah

The Sub Divisional Magistrate, Jalna; The State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal writ petition challenging an externment order

Remedy Sought

Quashing of externment order dated 18th March 2013 passed by Sub Divisional Magistrate, Jalna

Filing Reason

Petitioner aggrieved by externment order under Section 56(1) of Bombay Police Act, 1951

Previous Decisions

Externment order passed by Sub Divisional Magistrate, Jalna on 18th March 2013; appeal to Secretary (Home Department) dismissed

Issues

Whether the externment order under Section 56(1) of Bombay Police Act, 1951 was validly passed Whether the authority applied its mind to the material before passing the order

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the externment order was passed without proper application of mind and based on mere registration of cases State argued that the order was justified to prevent harm or danger

Ratio Decidendi

An externment order under Section 56(1) of the Bombay Police Act, 1951 requires the authority to record subjective satisfaction based on credible material showing that the person's movements are causing harm or danger. Mere registration of criminal cases does not justify externment without such satisfaction.

Judgment Excerpts

We have gone through the proceedings referred to above. Four cases arising out of Crime Nos.3027/2008; 3036/2008; ... The order of externment recorded by Sub Divisional Magistrate, Jalna, dated 18th March, 2013 in terms of Section 56(1) of Bombay Police Act, 1951.

Procedural History

The Sub Divisional Magistrate, Jalna passed an externment order on 18th March 2013 under Section 56(1) of Bombay Police Act, 1951. The petitioner appealed to the Secretary (Special) Home Department, Government of Maharashtra, which confirmed the order. The petitioner then filed Criminal Writ Petition No.601/2013 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench.

Acts & Sections

  • Bombay Police Act, 1951: 56(1)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Externment Order Under Section 56(1) of Bombay Police Act, 1951 for Non-Application of Mind. Mere Registration of Four Criminal Cases Does Not Justify Externment Without Subjective Satisfaction.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 9 Petition for Interim Relief in Arbitration Dispute Over Lease Deposit Refund. Court holds that a claim for refund of a deposit is a monetary claim and cannot be secured by way of interim measure under Section 9 o...