Search Results for "Mines and Minerals Act 1957"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Determination that Non-Signatory to MoS Not B...

Search Results for "Mines and Minerals Act 1957"

217 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 217 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Mining Lease Renewal — Lease Deemed Expired Under Section 8A of MMDR Act, 1957. The petitioner's mining lease for iron ore in Goa expired on 22.11.2007, and the renewal application was rejected; no automatic extension under Section 8A as the lease had already expired.

8 May 2026

The petitioners, Shantilal Khushaldas & Brothers Pvt. Ltd. and its director Mukesh M. Saglani, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 05.11....

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Patna Municipal Corporation's Appeal in Advertisement Royalty Dispute — Distinguishes Royalty from Tax and Upholds Corporation's Power to Charge Royalty Based on Agreement. The Court held that royalty is a contractual consideration, not a tax, and does not require legislative sanction under Article 265 of the Constitution.

17 Oct 2024

The Supreme Court dealt with appeals by the Patna Municipal Corporation against a Division Bench judgment of the Patna High Court which had held that ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Quashing Royalty and Penalty Imposed on IKEA for Earth Excavated During Store Development. Earth Excavated and Utilised for Backfilling, Levelling, and Internal Roads on the Same Plot Is Exempt from Royalty Under Section 48(7) of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966, Read with Rule 46 of the Extraction Rules, 2013.

10 Apr 2024

The Bombay High Court allowed a writ petition filed by IKEA India Private Limited and its authorised officer, challenging the demand for royalty and p...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Mining Complaint Due to Lack of Sanction Under Section 22 of Mines and Minerals Act. Complaint Filed by Geologist Without Prior Sanction from Central or State Government is Not Maintainable.

14 Oct 2022

The petitioner, M/S SVB Stone Crushers, a partnership firm represented by its partner Sri K H Suresh, filed a writ petition under Section 482 read wit...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals by Captive Power Producers in Hydel Policy Dispute Over Water Royalty Charges. The court held that the agreements incorporating the government policy did not impose water royalty liability on captive power producers, distinguishing them from independent power producers under the policy framework.

6 Sep 2021

The dispute arose from appeals filed by M/s. Indsil Hydro Power and Manganese Limited (INDSIL) and Carborundum Universal Limited (CUMI) against a comm...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind and Lack of Material to Show Public Order Threat. Theft of sand and IPC offences held to be law and order issues, not public order.

15 Dec 2020

The petitioner, Narayan Radhakishan Bhusari, challenged his preventive detention under Section 3 of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds FIRs for Illegal Mining Despite Compounding Under MMDR Act — IPC Offences Are Distinct and Not Barred by Section 22 of MMDR Act. The court held that compounding under the MMDR Act does not bar prosecution under the IPC for theft and criminal misappropriation, as the offences are separate and distinct.

1 Sep 2020

The Supreme Court dismissed appeals by private appellants and the State of Madhya Pradesh against the High Court's refusal to quash FIRs for illegal m...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Illegal Sand Mining Case Due to Lack of Sanction Under MMDR Act. Petitioner/Accused No.1 Charged Under Section 379 IPC and Sections 21, 22 of MMDR Act for Alleged Theft of Sand – Proceedings Quashed as Cognizance Without Required Sanction Under Section 22 of MMDR Act is Invalid.

16 Jul 2019

The petitioner, Shri Rudrappa, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking to quash the proceedings in C.C. No...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Interim Orders Under Section 9 of Arbitration Act — Orders Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Pre-Arbitration Procedure. The court held that the learned Principal District Judge lacked jurisdiction to grant interim relief under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, as the applicant failed to comply with the mandatory pre-arbitration conciliation procedure agreed upon in the contract.

6 Jun 2017

The petitioners, Mineira Nacional Limitada and others, filed a writ petition challenging two orders dated 13.01.2016 and 29.11.2016 passed by the lear...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Revisional Authority's Order Cancelling Mining Lease — Notification Under Section 17A(1A) of MMDR Act Upheld. State Government's Grant of Mining Lease Without Prior Central Approval Invalid Under Section 17A(1A) of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957.

26 Mar 2014

The petitioner, Vidarbha Mining Association, a partnership firm, applied for a mining lease for 69.10 hectares of land in village Chikhla, Taluka Tums...

9 10 11 12 13

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)