Search Results for "Marathi language"

338 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 338 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Non-Consideration of Representation. Failure to Consider Detenu's Representation Before Confirmation Violates Article 22(5) of the Constitution.

The petitioner, Wasim @ Mukri A.Salar, was detained under Section 3(1) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Failure to Prove Motive. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Gopal Shankarappa Rathod, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Kolhapur, for the murder of his wife Savita under Section 302 IPC and se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape and Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence. Conviction under Sections 376 and 302 IPC Set Aside as Circumstantial Evidence Fails to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Sakharam Sitaram Bhise, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Hingoli in Sessions Trial Case No. 72/2010 for offences punisha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Probate of Will in Testamentary Suit, Upholds Execution Despite Handwritten Additions and Suspicious Circumstances. Propounders Discharged Burden of Proof Under Section 63 of Indian Succession Act, 1925 by Examining Attesting Witness and Explaining Circumstances.

The plaintiffs, Kirit N. Damania and Shantaram V. Pikale, executors named in the Will of Shashikala Baburao Alandkar, sought probate of the Will dated...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as last seen witness testimony was unnatural and contradictory.

The appellant, Nazira w/o Anwarkhan, was convicted by the 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad on 9th February 2001 in Sessions Case No.305 of 19...