Bombay High Court Grants Letters of Administration with Will Annexed in Testamentary Suit — Will Proved to be Duly Executed and Attested. Court holds that the propounder of the Will has discharged the burden of proving due execution and attestation under Section 63 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 and Section 68 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 69
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The plaintiff, Mahendra Gajanan Karve, filed a Testamentary Petition No. 514 of 2004 seeking Letters of Administration with the Will annexed in respect of the estate of his deceased father, Gajanan Vishnu Karve, who died on 3.8.2003. The deceased executed a Will in Marathi on 8.11.2000, which was witnessed by two attesting witnesses, Rajesh S. Bansod and Geeta Chandrakant Pawar. The plaintiff, a beneficiary under the Will, filed the petition on 28.6.2004 along with an affidavit of one attesting witness. The defendant, Jitendra Gajanan Karve, another son of the deceased, opposed the grant, alleging that the Will was not duly executed and that the testator was not in a sound disposing state of mind. The suit was converted from the petition. During pendency, another son Jayant Gajanan Karve died, and his legal heirs were brought on record. The court framed issues regarding due execution, attestation, and the testator's mental capacity. The plaintiff examined himself and one attesting witness, Rajesh S. Bansod, who testified that the testator signed the Will in his presence and that he and the other witness attested it in the testator's presence. The defendant did not lead any evidence. The court held that the plaintiff discharged the burden of proof under Section 63 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 and Section 68 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. The court found no suspicious circumstances and noted that the Will was in Marathi, a language the testator understood. The court allowed the suit and granted Letters of Administration with the Will annexed to the plaintiff.

Headnote

A) Succession Law - Will - Proof of Execution and Attestation - Section 63 of Indian Succession Act, 1925 and Section 68 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - The propounder of a Will must prove that the testator signed the Will in the presence of two attesting witnesses who attested it in his presence and in the presence of each other - The court held that the plaintiff discharged this burden by examining one attesting witness who proved the execution and attestation - The Will was in Marathi and the testator was literate in Marathi - No suspicious circumstances were established by the defendant - Held that the Will is duly proved and Letters of Administration be granted (Paras 1-26).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the plaintiff has proved the due execution and attestation of the Will dated 8.11.2000 executed by the deceased Gajanan Vishnu Karve and is entitled to Letters of Administration with the Will annexed.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the suit and granted Letters of Administration with the Will annexed to the plaintiff.

Law Points

  • Burden of proof on propounder of Will
  • Due execution and attestation under Section 63 of Indian Succession Act
  • 1925
  • Section 68 of Indian Evidence Act
  • 1872
  • Suspicious circumstances must be dispelled by propounder
  • Attesting witness must prove execution and attestation
  • Will in Marathi language valid
  • No evidence of undue influence or coercion
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (BOM) (03) 252

Testamentary Suit No. 45 of 2004 in Testamentary Petition No. 514 of 2004

2019-03-05

R. D. Dhanuka

Mr. Abhijit A. Desai I/by Jaydeep A Shringare for the Plaintiff, Mr. Shrinivas Bhave along with Ms. Sunayna Kashid I/by Bhave & Co. for the Defendant

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Testamentary suit for grant of Letters of Administration with Will annexed.

Remedy Sought

Plaintiff seeks Letters of Administration with or without Will annexed in respect of the property and credits of the deceased Gajanan Vishnu Karve.

Filing Reason

The deceased executed a Will dated 8.11.2000, and the plaintiff, a beneficiary, seeks administration of the estate.

Issues

Whether the Will dated 8.11.2000 was duly executed and attested as per Section 63 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925? Whether the plaintiff has proved the due execution and attestation of the Will? Whether the testator was in a sound disposing state of mind at the time of execution?

Submissions/Arguments

Plaintiff argued that the Will was executed by the testator in the presence of two attesting witnesses who attested it in his presence and in the presence of each other, and that the plaintiff has discharged the burden of proof. Defendant argued that the Will was not duly executed and that the testator was not in a sound disposing state of mind, but led no evidence.

Ratio Decidendi

The propounder of a Will must prove due execution and attestation under Section 63 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 and Section 68 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. The examination of one attesting witness who proves the execution and attestation is sufficient. The court found no suspicious circumstances and held that the Will was validly executed.

Judgment Excerpts

By this testamentary suit which is converted from Testamentary Petition No.514 of 2004, the plaintiff (original petitioner) seeks Letters of Administration with or without Will annexed in respect of the property and credits of the deceased Mr. Gajanan Vishnu Karve who expired on 3.8.2003. It is the case of the plaintiff that the said deceased had executed the said Will dated 8.11.2000 in Marathi which was duly witnessed by Mr. Shri. R.S. Bansod and Mrs. Geeta Chandrakant Pawar. The court held that the plaintiff has discharged the burden of proof and the Will is duly proved.

Procedural History

The plaintiff filed Testamentary Petition No. 514 of 2004 on 28.6.2004. The petition was converted into Testamentary Suit No. 45 of 2004. During pendency, one of the sons, Jayant Gajanan Karve, died and his legal heirs were brought on record. The suit was reserved on 20th Feb. 2019 and pronounced on 5th March, 2019.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Succession Act, 1925: Section 63
  • Indian Evidence Act, 1872: Section 68
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Cross FIRs in Assault Case Following Amicable Settlement Between Parties. Court Holds That Where Dispute Is Personal and Parties Have Genuinely Settled, FIRs for Offences Under Sections 307, 324, 143, 144, 147, 149 IPC Can B...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Directs State to Communicate Reasons for Rejecting College Permission Application. State Government Failed to Comply with Earlier Court Order to Provide Reasons for Rejection of Application Under Section 83 of Maharashtra Universiti...