Search Results for "MRTU PULP Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "MRTU PULP Act"

581 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 581 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Maintainability of Successive Recognition Application Under Section 14 of MRTU & PULP Act. No One-Year Bar Exists After Disposal of Previous Application; Only Bar is Within One Year of Recognition of Another Union.

2 Feb 2005

The case involves a challenge by the Petitioner Union, Kamgar Utkarsha Sabha, which was a recognized trade union in the undertaking of Respondent No.2...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Industrial Court Orders in Labour Dispute — Upholds Interim Relief Granted to Union Under Section 30(2) of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971. Industrial Court Has Jurisdiction to Grant Interim Relief Without First Deciding Maintainability of Complaint.

19 Oct 2015

The case involves four writ petitions filed by industrial companies (M/s Saklecha Steel Industries Pvt. Ltd., M/s Sudesh Steel Industries Pvt. Ltd., M...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Writ Petition in Bonus Dispute Under Amended Section 12 of Payment of Bonus Act, 1965. The court upheld the Industrial Court's finding that denial of bonus based on Rs.3,500 salary limit constitutes an unfair labour practice under Item 9 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act.

18 Feb 2014

The petitioner, Babasaheb Kedar Shetkari Sahakari Sut Girni, a cooperative spinning mill, challenged the judgment and order of the Industrial Court, N...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Workmen's Petitions Challenging Labour Court's Refusal of Interim Relief in Unfair Labour Practice Complaints. Petitioners Failed to Establish Prima Facie Case of Victimization Under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

17 Sep 2016

The judgment pertains to a group of writ petitions filed by workmen (original complainants) against SKF India Ltd and its General Manager (HR), challe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order in Unfair Labour Practice Case. Elected Representatives Under BIR Act Have Locus Standi to File Complaint Under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

16 Jan 2014

The petitioner, M/s. Neco Schubert and Salzer Ltd., an employer, filed a writ petition challenging the judgment and order dated 9 January 2004 passed ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment in Revision Petition Under MRTU & PULP Act — Industrial Court Has Power to Permit Amendment. The Court held that the Industrial Court exercising revisional jurisdiction under Section 44 of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions & Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 has the power to permit amendment of the memo of revision petition, as the power to allow amendment is inherent in the exercise of revisional jurisdiction.

5 May 2022

The petitioners, Rashtrasant Tukdoji Maharaj Technical and Educational Society and another, challenged an order dated 16/09/2019 passed by the Industr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employees' Petitions in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Temporary Appointments Cancelled Before Completion of 240 Days Service. Industrial Court's finding that petitioners did not complete 240 days of continuous service under MRTU & PULP Act upheld.

8 Jan 2010

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by employees against the Wardha District Cooperative Agricultural, Rural and Multipurpose Development B...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Against Industrial Court Order Directing Reinstatement of Workmen in Unfair Labour Practice Case. Employer Challenges Order Alleging Denial of Cross-Examination and Lack of Jurisdiction Under Maharashtra Recognition Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971.

17 Oct 2025

The writ petition arose from an industrial dispute between L. G Balakrishnan & Bros Ltd., a manufacturer of chain kits, and its workmen represented by...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Industrial Court's Territorial Jurisdiction in Unfair Labour Practice Complaint Filed by Union for Employee Posted Outside Maharashtra. The Court held that the Industrial Court under MRTU & PULP Act has jurisdiction if the employer's establishment is within Maharashtra, even if the employee works outside the state.

22 Mar 2024

The Petitioner, M/s. Abbott India Ltd., a pharmaceutical company incorporated under the Indian Companies Act, 1956, and its officer Mr. Jitendra Wadhw...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Reinstatement of Daily Wage Employee Terminated for Absence Without Inquiry — Employer Failed to Prove Abandonment or Conduct Domestic Inquiry Under MRTU & PULP Act. Termination of a daily wage employee for 15 days' unauthorized absence without holding a domestic inquiry was held to be an unfair labour practice under Item 1 of Schedule IV of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971, and the employee was entitled to reinstatement with full back wages.

28 Sep 2010

The Administrator of Kalyan Municipal Corporation challenged the orders of the Labour Court and Industrial Court which found the termination of Respon...

9 10 11 12 13

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)