Search Results for "IPC Section 363"

397 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 397 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO and IPC Case Due to Inconsistent Victim Testimony and Lack of Medical Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 363, 366, 376 IPC and Sections 4, 6 POCSO Act set aside as prosecution failed to prove age and penetration beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Naresh @ Lalo Rayaji Rathod, was convicted by the Special & Additional Sessions Judge, Bharuch in Special POCSO Case No. 56/2015 for of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Upholds Conviction for Kidnapping and Abduction in Sessions Case No.16 of 2006 — Acquittal for Rape Stands. Appellant No.2's conviction under Sections 363, 366 and 114 IPC confirmed based on consistent testimony of prosecutrix and medical evidence.

The case arises from a criminal appeal against the judgment of conviction dated 31.07.2005 passed by the learned Fast Track Court, Bhavnagar in Sessio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Upholds Acquittal in Kidnapping and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Consent. Allegations under Sections 363, 366, 376 IPC and Atrocity Act fail as victim's testimony is unreliable and medical evidence does not support prosecution case.

The State of Gujarat filed an acquittal appeal under Section 378 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, challenging the judgment and order dated 10.01....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Unproven Age of Victim and Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction under Sections 366A, 344, 376(2)(n) IPC and Section 6 POCSO Act set aside as prosecution failed to establish victim's minority beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Anil S/o Bhayrappa Khairav, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, FTSC-I (POCSO), Vijayapura, in Special Case (POCSO) No.15/2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Convict in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Consent — Conviction Under Section 376 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Absence of Consent Beyond Reasonable Doubt

The appellant, Munja s/o Jijabhau Bhange, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Parbhani, for an offence punishable under Section 376 of the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Age Evidence and Consensual Relationship. Victim's Age Not Proved Below 18, and Sexual Intercourse Was Consensual, Leading to Acquittal Under Sections 363, 376 IPC and Section 3/4 POCSO Act.

The appellant, Yadav Chandoba Dawlekar, was convicted by the Special Judge/Additional Sessions Judge-4, Nanded, in Special Case (POCSO) No.19 of 2015 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Age of Victim. Conviction under Sections 363, 377, 323 IPC and Section 4 POCSO Act set aside as prosecution failed to establish victim's minority and guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Pankaj Dadarao Ambadkar, was convicted by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-1 & Special Judge, Achalpur in Special (POCSO) Case No....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Kidnapping and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Proof of Age. Conviction under Sections 363, 366A, and 376 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Victim's Age Below 18 and Consent Was Voluntary.

The appellant, Parvesh Bagde, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Chandrapur, for offences under Sections 363, 366A, and 376 of the Indian...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Kidnapping and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 363, 366, 376 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Raju S/o Bhimrao Girnare, was convicted by the learned Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Buldana, for offences punishable under Sections...