Gujarat High Court Upholds Conviction for Kidnapping and Abduction in Sessions Case No.16 of 2006 — Acquittal for Rape Stands. Appellant No.2's conviction under Sections 363, 366 and 114 IPC confirmed based on consistent testimony of prosecutrix and medical evidence.

High Court: Gujarat High Court In Favour of Prosecution
  • 125
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case arises from a criminal appeal against the judgment of conviction dated 31.07.2005 passed by the learned Fast Track Court, Bhavnagar in Sessions Case No.16 of 2006. The appellants, Vijay Kalubhai Koli (since deceased and appeal abated) and another, were tried for offences under Sections 363, 366, 376 and 114 of the Indian Penal Code. The trial court acquitted them of the charge under Section 376 IPC but convicted them under Sections 363, 366 and 114 IPC, sentencing them to 3 years rigorous imprisonment and fine for each offence, with sentences to run concurrently. The appeal qua appellant No.1 abated due to his death on 26.12.2017. The remaining appellant challenged the conviction. The High Court examined the evidence, including the testimony of the prosecutrix, who consistently stated that she was taken away by the accused against her will. Medical evidence indicated her age was below 18 years. The court found no reason to disbelieve the prosecutrix and held that the prosecution had proved its case beyond reasonable doubt. The appeal was dismissed, and the conviction and sentence were upheld.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Kidnapping and Abduction - Sections 363, 366, 114 IPC - Conviction upheld - The appellant was convicted for kidnapping a minor girl and abducting her with intent to marry. The court relied on the consistent testimony of the prosecutrix and medical evidence showing her age below 18 years. Held that the prosecution proved its case beyond reasonable doubt (Paras 1-10).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the conviction of the appellant under Sections 363, 366 and 114 of the Indian Penal Code is sustainable in law.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is dismissed. The conviction and sentence passed by the learned Fast Track Court, Bhavnagar in Sessions Case No.16 of 2006 are upheld.

Law Points

  • Kidnapping
  • Abduction
  • Abetment
  • Conviction upheld
  • Acquittal for rape
  • Concurrent sentences
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (GUJ) (01) 138

R/CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1666 of 2006

2026-01-12

Gita Gopi

Mr. Gaurang K. Chauhan for Appellant No.2, Ms. Jyoti Bhatt, Additional Public Prosecutor for Respondent

Vijay Kalubhai Koli (Abated) & Anr.

The State of Gujarat

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against conviction for kidnapping and abduction.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought acquittal from conviction under Sections 363, 366 and 114 IPC.

Filing Reason

Appellant was convicted by the trial court and sentenced to 3 years rigorous imprisonment.

Previous Decisions

Trial court convicted both accused under Sections 363, 366 and 114 IPC and acquitted them under Section 376 IPC.

Issues

Whether the conviction under Sections 363, 366 and 114 IPC is sustainable.

Submissions/Arguments

Learned advocate for appellant submitted that the conviction is not sustainable.

Ratio Decidendi

The consistent testimony of the prosecutrix coupled with medical evidence establishing her minority is sufficient to sustain conviction for kidnapping and abduction under Sections 363 and 366 IPC read with Section 114 IPC.

Judgment Excerpts

The challenge is given to the judgment of conviction dated 31.07.2005 passed by the learned Fast Track Court, Bhavnagar in Sessions Case No.16 of 2006.

Procedural History

Trial court convicted accused on 31.07.2005. Appeal filed in 2006. Appeal qua appellant No.1 abated on 12.12.2025 due to death. Present judgment on 12.01.2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC): 363, 366, 376, 114
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation for Injured Minor in Motor Accident Case — Multiplier Applied for Future Loss of Earning Capacity. Claimant, a 16-year-old student, suffered 30% permanent disability; compensation increased from Rs.3,66...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Bail Cancellation Case Due to Non-compliance with Financial Undertaking. High Court's order cancelling bail upheld as appellant failed to pay full compensation amount of Rs.4,63,50,000 as per settlement under Section...