Search Results for "GST Assessment"

155 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 155 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging GST Assessment Order Due to Availability of Alternative Remedy. Petitioner directed to avail statutory appeal under Section 107 of the Tamil Nadu Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madras High Court challenging an assessment order dated...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Sets Aside GST Assessment Order for Violation of Natural Justice, Remands on Condition of 25% Pre-Deposit. Assessment order passed without hearing the petitioner under GST Act was quashed and matter remanded for fresh consideration subject to pre-deposit of 25% of disputed tax demand.

The petitioner, Duraisamy Madheshwaran, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madras High Court challenging ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Ex Parte GST Assessment Order, Permits Appeal with 10% Pre-Deposit. Petitioner's case falls under 'Zero' liability category, court grants relief by allowing appeal filing beyond limitation subject to pre-deposit.

The petitioner, Oxygen Fuels, a sole proprietorship represented by its proprietor Mohammed Saffick Guddhus, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Writ Petition Challenging Review Orders on MVAT Refund Adjustments Quashed by Bombay High Court. Bombay High Court invalidates review orders under Section 15 of the Maharashtra Settlement of Arrears of Taxes Act due to lack of jurisdiction, directing refund of Rs. 2.72 crores with interest.

The Bombay High Court quashed review orders issued under Section 15 of the Maharashtra Settlement of Arrears of Taxes Act, 2022 (Settlement Act). The ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeal in Central Excise Clandestine Removal Case — CESTAT Order Upheld for Lack of Evidence. Allegation of removal of 1,687,585.511 kg of yarn without duty payment fails as Revenue could not prove clandestine removal beyond reasonable doubt.

The Principal Commissioner of Central GST & C. Ex., Daman Commissionerate, filed an appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, against ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Seizure and Confiscation of Medical Equipment Imported Under Customs Duty Exemption — Limitation Period Under Section 110(2) of Customs Act, 1962 Mandates Return of Seized Goods if No Notice Issued Within Six Months

The petitioners, Insight Diagnostic Oncological & Research Institute Private Limited and Dr. Anil V. Purohit, imported a Computerised Treadmill on 11 ...