Search Results for "Exclusive Special Court"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Exclusive Special Court"

2184 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2184 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Considers Appeal Against High Court's Rs. 50 Lakh Cost and CBI Probe in Habeas Corpus Case Involving Allegations of Illegal Detention and Political Mudslinging. High Court Had Found the Petition an Abuse of Process, Imposed Costs, and Directed CBI Investigation Against the Petitioner.

1 Aug 2026

The appeal arose from an order of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad (Lucknow Bench) dated 7 March 2011, dismissing a habeas corpus writ petiti...

High Court

Petitioner Challenges NCLT Order Admitted Under Section 7 IBC on Ground of Non-Pronouncement and Violation of NCLT Rules. High Court of Bombay Issues Rule and Hears Petition Alleging Order Non-Est for Lack of Pronouncement in Open Court.

29 Nov 2019

Not mentioned - judgment text incomplete...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Arbitration Appeal Against Order Setting Aside Arbitral Award in Family Business Dispute. Dispute Centers on Inclusion of Agricultural Lands Held by Individual Family Members in Family Asset Separation Process.

14 Jun 2013

The appeal arose from a family dispute within the Malhotra family of Pune, who owned and controlled several businesses including Weikfield Products Co...

Supreme Court

"Supreme Court of India Resolves Complexities in Taxation of Mineral Rights" "Judgment Clarifies Legislative Powers and the Nature of Royalty in Mining Sector"

25 Jul 2024

The Supreme Court of India addressed a significant dispute regarding the distribution of legislative powers between the Union and the States, specific...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds That Jurisdiction for Section 34 Challenge to MSMED Act Award Is Governed by Section 18(4) of MSMED Act, Not by Exclusive Jurisdiction Clause in Agreement. The non obstante provision in Section 18(4) overrides the arbitration agreement, and the Section 34 petition must be filed at the place where the supplier is located.

16 Oct 2024

The case involves a reference to a Larger Bench of the Bombay High Court to resolve a conflict between two Single Judge decisions regarding the jurisd...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Considers Challenge to Section 36(4) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Restricting Legal Representation Without Consent. Employer Seeks to Quash Labour Court Order Barring Engagement of Advocate in Industrial Dispute Reference.

1 Mar 2018

The petitioner, a company engaged in manufacturing, dismissed the respondent workman for misconduct after due process in August 2015. The workman rais...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Transfer of Criminal Cases Under Sections 482 and 407 of Cr.P.C. Accused Challenged Territorial Jurisdiction of Courts Outside Mumbai Alleging Offences Committed in Mumbai Under Section 181(4) of Cr.P.C.

9 Jul 2021

The matter concerned nine criminal applications filed under Sections 482 and 407 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking transfer of multiple ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Enforcement Petition for Foreign Award Citing Lack of Jurisdiction Due to Prior Section 34 Filing. Section 42 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Vests Exclusive Jurisdiction with the Court at Jamkhambalia Where the Section 34 Application Was First Filed.

20 Dec 2010

The petitioners, Pacific Basin Ihx (UK) Ltd., a company incorporated in England engaged in shipping, sought enforcement of a foreign arbitration award...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Central Excise Case — Cutting and Grooving of Aluminum Composite Panels Does Not Amount to Manufacture. Process of cutting, grooving, and routing ACPs for façade cladding does not bring into existence a new product with distinct name, character, and use under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

27 May 2026

The appellant, is a construction contractor that imports Aluminum Composite Panels (ACPs) and undertakes cutting, grooving, and routing of these panel...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Revision Under Section 115 CPC Not Maintainable Against Small Causes Court Decree Under Section 26A of Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1887; Writ Under Article 227 Is Maintainable. The court resolved a conflict between two single judge decisions regarding the remedy available against decrees passed under Section 26A of the Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1887.

7 Dec 2016

The case involved two writ petitions placed before a larger bench due to a conflict of decisions by single judges of the Bombay High Court regarding t...

9 10 11 12 13

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)