Bombay High Court Considers Transfer of Criminal Cases Under Sections 482 and 407 of Cr.P.C. Accused Challenged Territorial Jurisdiction of Courts Outside Mumbai Alleging Offences Committed in Mumbai Under Section 181(4) of Cr.P.C.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The matter concerned nine criminal applications filed under Sections 482 and 407 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking transfer of multiple criminal cases pending in various courts across Maharashtra to a competent court in Mumbai for trial. The applicant, Sanjay Hariram Agrawal, was the original accused in these cases, which pertained to offences such as criminal breach of trust, cheating, forgery, and criminal conspiracy under the Indian Penal Code. The cases were pending before courts in Mumbai, Nagpur, Wardha, Pune, Amravati and Osmanabad. The applicant contended that the company of which he was Chairman and CEO, M/s Home Trade Ltd., was engaged in stock and securities broking and was a member of the National Stock Exchange, Bombay Stock Exchange and Pune Stock Exchange. The transactions in question, involving Government of India securities, were executed in Mumbai, including issuance of contract notes and money transactions. The applicant pointed to an FIR lodged on 25/04/2002 at Ganeshpeth Police Station, Nagpur by the then Chairman of Nagpur District Central Co-operative Bank Ltd. regarding delayed delivery of Rs.125.60 crores, and a subsequent FIR lodged on 29/04/2002 by a Special Auditor against the then Chairman and General Manager of the bank. The applicant argued that because the alleged offences were of criminal misappropriation or criminal breach of trust and the entire transactions occurred in Mumbai, the courts outside Mumbai lacked territorial jurisdiction under Section 181(4) Cr.P.C. He relied heavily on the Full Bench judgment in re Jivandas Savchand reported in AIR 1930 Bom 490 and other Supreme Court judgments. The Advocate General for the State also made submissions. The court heard the parties and reserved judgment on 24/06/2021, pronouncing it on 09/07/2021. The extracted text does not include the final decision or the court's analysis, and therefore the outcome, ratio decidendi, and detailed reasoning are not available from the provided excerpt.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure - Transfer of Criminal Cases - Territorial Jurisdiction - Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Sections 482, 407, 181(4) - The applicant, original accused in multiple criminal cases pending before courts in Mumbai, Nagpur, Wardha, Pune, Amravati and Osmanabad, sought transfer of all cases to a competent court in Mumbai on the ground that the transactions underlying the offences occurred entirely in Mumbai and hence only Mumbai courts had territorial jurisdiction under Section 181(4) Cr.P.C. The applicant relied on the Full Bench decision in re Jivandas Savchand and other Supreme Court judgments. The Advocate General for the State also advanced submissions. The available judgment excerpt does not record the court's final decision or reasoning; the matter was reserved on 24-06-2021 and pronounced on 09-07-2021. (Paras 1-6).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the criminal cases pending in various courts outside Mumbai should be transferred to Mumbai under Sections 482 and 407 Cr.P.C. on the ground that the entire transactions occurred in Mumbai and the outside courts lack territorial jurisdiction under Section 181(4) Cr.P.C.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Law Points

  • Territorial jurisdiction under Section 181(4) Cr.P.C.
  • transfer of cases under Sections 482 and 407 Cr.P.C.
  • criminal breach of trust and misappropriation jurisdiction
  • consolidation of trials
  • reliance on Full Bench decision in Jivandas Savchand
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2021 LawText (BOM) (07) 46

Criminal Application No. 628 of 2014 with Interim Application No.63 of 2020, Criminal Application No. 889 of 2019 in Criminal Application No. 332 of 2015, Criminal Application No. 332 of 2015 in Criminal Application No. 624 of 2014, Criminal Application No. 333 of 2015 in Criminal Application No. 624 of 2014, Criminal Application No. 624 of 2014, Criminal Application No. 625 of 2014, Criminal Application No. 626 of 2014, Criminal Application No. 627 of 2014, Criminal Application No. 629 of 2014, Criminal Application No. 630 of 2014, Criminal Application No. 631 of 2014, Criminal Application No. 1022 of 2014, Civil Public Interest Litigation No. 15 of 2020, Interim Application No.2250 of 2020

2021-07-09

A. A. Sayed, Madhav J. Jamdar

Mr.Niteen Pradhan, Ms.Shubhada Khot, Ms.Ameeta Kuttikrishnan, Mr.Aditya Lasaria, Ms.Tanvi Tapkire, Mr.Amey Mahadik, Mr.Anthony Nadar, Mr.A.A.Kumbhakoni, Advocate General, Mr.P.P.Kakade, GP, Ms.A.A.Purav, AGP, Mr.Akshay Shinde, Mr.A.R. Patil, Mr.B.B.Tiwari, Ms.G.M.Dubash, Mr.D.H. Sharma, Mr.Prateek D. Sharma, Mr.Girish Purohit, Mr.Abhijeet Desai, Surbhi Agarwal, Ms.Apurvi Joshi, Ms.Chandni Sachade, Mr.Pramod Patil, Komal Mestry, Mr.D.D.Patil, Mr.D.S.Patil, Ms.Neha Bhide, Mr.Sanjiv Sawant, Rutu Pawar, Mr.Joe Carlos, Mr.Pralhad Paranjape, Mr.Manish Kelkar, Druti Datar, Mr.Surel Shah, Mr.Rahul Kasbekar, Mr.S.P.Bhandarkar

Sanjay Hariram Agrawal

The State of Maharashtra, Omprakash Baburao Kamdi, Wardha District Central Co-operative Bank Ltd., and Others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal applications under Sections 482 and 407 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking transfer of multiple criminal cases from various courts to Mumbai for trial.

Remedy Sought

Applicant sought transfer of nine criminal cases detailed in the judgment to a competent court in Mumbai, contending that only Mumbai courts had jurisdiction as the alleged transactions occurred in Mumbai.

Filing Reason

Applicant contended that offences alleged were of criminal misappropriation or criminal breach of trust, and the entire transactions took place in Mumbai; therefore, under Section 181(4) Cr.P.C., courts outside Mumbai lacked jurisdiction and cases should be transferred.

Issues

Whether the criminal cases pending in various courts outside Mumbai should be transferred to Mumbai under Sections 482 and 407 Cr.P.C. Whether the courts at Nagpur, Wardha, Pune, Amravati and Osmanabad lacked territorial jurisdiction under Section 181(4) Cr.P.C. as the transactions occurred in Mumbai.

Submissions/Arguments

Applicant argued that all transactions underlying the criminal cases took place in Mumbai, and therefore courts outside Mumbai lack jurisdiction under Section 181(4) Cr.P.C. Applicant relied on Full Bench judgment reported in AIR 1930 Bom 490 (Jivandas Savchand) and other Supreme Court judgments. Applicant stated that the company was a member of NSE, BSE and PSE and contract notes were executed in Mumbai. Applicant described delayed delivery of Rs.125.60 crores to NDCCB and subsequent FIRs lodged at Nagpur. Advocate General for State advanced submissions opposing transfer (details not provided in extracted text).

Judgment Excerpts

he Applicant, who is the original accused in various criminal cases pending in various Courts, namely, Mumbai, Wardha, Nagpur, Pune and Osmanabad has filed above referred nine Criminal Applications under sections 482 and 407 of the Code of Criminal Procedure,1973 inter alia seeking transfer of these cases to the Competent Court in Mumbai for its trial in accordance with law. He mainly relied on section 181(4) of the Cr.P.C., 1973. He has very heavily relied on the Full Bench judgment of this Court reported in AIR 1930 Bom 490 = 32 BLR 1195 in re Jivandas Savchand. he Applicant was Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of M/s.Home Trade Ltd., a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956 there was delayed delivery of Rs.125.60 crores to NDCCB and, therefore, the FIR was lodged.

Procedural History

On 25/04/2002, FIR C.R.No.97 of 2002 was lodged at Ganeshpeth Police Station, Nagpur by the then Chairman of NDCCB Sunil Babashed Kedar for offences under Sections 406, 420 read with 34 IPC against five companies including Home Trade Ltd. On 29/04/2002, FIR C.R.No.101/2002 was lodged by Special Auditor at Ganesh Peth Police Station against the then Chairman and General Manager of NDCCB. Subsequently, criminal cases were registered and pending before various courts in Mumbai, Nagpur, Wardha, Pune, Amravati and Osmanabad as detailed in the judgment. The applicant filed nine criminal applications under Sections 482 and 407 Cr.P.C. seeking transfer of these cases to Mumbai. The court heard the applications, reserved judgment on 24/06/2021, and pronounced judgment on 09/07/2021.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 482, 407, 181(4)
  • Indian Penal Code: 409, 420, 34, 120B, 406, 465, 467, 468, 471, 408
  • Companies Act, 1956:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Considers Transfer of Criminal Cases Under Sections 482 and 407 of Cr.P.C. Accused Challenged Territorial Jurisdiction of Courts Outside Mumbai Alleging Offences Committed in Mumbai Under Section 181(4) of Cr.P.C.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Defendant's Appeal and Dismisses Money Recovery Suit Barred by Limitation Despite Valid Partnership Registration. A suit for recovery based on invoices failed as no acknowledgment or part payment extended limitation, and time spe...