Search Results for "Delayed Payment Charges"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Delayed Payment Charges"

647 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 647 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows EPF Authority's Petition Against Tribunal's Reduction of Damages Under Section 14B of EPF Act. Mens Rea Not Required for Imposition of Damages for Delayed Remittance; Tribunal's Order Set Aside for Lack of Reasons.

13 Sep 2022

The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner-I, Employees' Provident Fund Organization, Bengaluru, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Cancellation of Plot Allotment and Forfeiture by CIDCO — Directs Issuance of Demand Letter for Second Installment with Late Payment Charges. The court held that the cancellation was arbitrary and violative of legitimate expectation, as CIDCO itself had sought relaxation of time limits under Regulation 15 of the New Bombay Disposal Land Regulations, 1975, which was approved by the State Government.

10 Sep 2024

The petitioner, M/s. Trishul Construction Co., was allotted three plots by CIDCO (respondent No.1) in 2007. The payment schedule required a first inst...

High Court

Bombay High Court Restrains Encashment of Bank Guarantee in Arbitration Dispute Between Contractor and Sub-Contractor. Court finds that invocation of bank guarantee was fraudulent and would cause irretrievable injustice to the petitioner.

5 Jan 2015

The petitioner, Simplex Infrastructure Limited, a civil and structural construction company, entered into a sub-contract with respondent No. 1, Siemen...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Challenge to Arbitral Award in Lease Dispute — Finds Perversity in Force Majeure Finding. Court holds that the Arbitrator's conclusion that the lessee's termination was not under the force majeure clause was perverse, but upholds other findings on delayed approvals and property tax dues.

19 Oct 2020

The case arises from a lease deed dated 1st August 2013 between Reliable Spaces Pvt Ltd (the Petitioner/Lessor) and Evonik India Pvt Ltd (the Responde...

High Court

High Court Allows Appeal in Commercial Arbitration Case, Restoring Arbitral Award on Price Adjustment Claim. The Court held that the Commercial Court erred in re-appreciating evidence and interpreting contract clauses under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, as the arbitral award was based on material evidence and not patently illegal.

2 Mar 2026

The dispute arose from a contract dated 09.07.2018 between the appellant, a contractor, and the respondent, the Deputy Commissioner of Dharwad Distric...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Dismisses Appeal by State Authority Against Arbitral Award in Favor of Contractor for Repair of Minor Irrigation Tanks. Court upholds award of interest and costs under Section 31(7)(a) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, finding no patent illegality or perversity in the arbitrator's findings.

29 Jan 2026

The present Commercial Arbitration Appeal was filed by the Appellants (Chief Engineer and Chief Administrator, Command Area Development Authority, Aur...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by State Undertaking in BOT Arbitration Dispute, Upholds Arbitral Award on Termination Payment. Court Reiterates Limited Scope of Judicial Interference Under Sections 34 and 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Emphasizing Finality of Arbitral Awards.

29 May 2026

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by Madhya Pradesh Road Development Corporation Ltd. (MPRDC) against the judgment of the Madhya Pradesh Hi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Construction Dispute — Upholds Rejection of Price Escalation and Interest Claims. Arbitrator's Interpretation of Contract Clause 70C and Discretion on Quantum Not Patently Illegal Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

8 Sep 2015

The petitioner, a consortium of M/s. Valecha Engineering Limited and M/s. AMA Private Limited, entered into a contract with the respondent, Airports A...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Upholds Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum Order Restricting Electricity Bill to 24 Months in Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited v. Head Master, Anudanit Prathamik Ashram Shala. The Court held that Regulation 6.4 of the MERC Regulations 2006 limits billing to 24 months prior to issuance, and the Forum's order was not perverse.

19 Jul 2022

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited, challenged an order dated 08.06.2016 passed by the Consumer Grievance Redr...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Examines Challenge to Commercial Court’s Dismissal of Section 34 Petitions Upholding Arbitral Awards on Escalation Claims. Dispute Arises Out of Delays in Five Hospital Renovation Projects Undertaken by Contractor and Alleged Breach of Contract by Government Entities.

19 Sep 2024

The appellant, a contractor, was the successful bidder for 14 projects relating to the renovation and expansion of various government hospitals in Kar...

9 10 11 12 13

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)