Search Results for "Commercial Division jurisdiction"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Commercial Division jurisdiction"

2991 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2991 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Upholding Maintainability of Arbitral Award Execution before Commercial Court. Execution Petition Held Competent Under Section 10(3) of Commercial Courts Act, 2015 as an Application Arising Out of Arbitration, Overruling Objections Based on Order XXI CPC.

10 Jun 2025

Abraham Memorial Education Trust, the petitioner and judgment debtor, challenged an order of the XI Additional District and Sessions Judge (Dedicated ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Summary Judgment in Recovery Suit Against DDA for Refund of Sale Consideration After Land Acquisition Lapses. The Court held that DDA cannot retain the money after failing to convey title due to lapsing of acquisition, and the suit was within limitation.

29 Apr 2026

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal against the Delhi High Court's order dismissing the appellant's application for summary judgment under Order XIII...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Defendant in Commercial Suit to File Written Statement Despite Expiry of 120-Day Limit Due to COVID-19 Disruptions. Time Limit Under Proviso to Order VIII Rule 1 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 as Substituted by Commercial Courts Act, 2015 Extended Considering Orders in Suo Motu Writ Petition (Civil) No. 3 of 2020 and Administrative Curtailment of Court Functioning.

14 Feb 2022

The dispute arose from a commercial suit filed by the plaintiff-respondent against the defendant-appellant for recovery of Rs. 3,73,24,821/- with inte...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Execution of Consent Decree in Commercial Suit — Decree Not Null and Void Despite Alleged Non-Compliance with Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC. Court Holds That a Consent Decree Can Be Executed Even If It Contains Terms Beyond the Suit, Provided Parties Freely Consented.

20 Dec 2018

The case arises from a commercial suit (Suit No. 119 of 2016) filed by Mahesh P. Raheja, Preeti P. Raheja, and Shakuntala P. Raheja (Respondent Nos. 1...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Order in MVAT Case Due to Limitation and Lack of Natural Justice. Inter-State Stock Transfer Not a Sale Under MVAT Act, 2002; Reassessment Beyond 4-Year Limitation Period Invalid.

29 Apr 2022

The petitioner, M/s. United Spirits Limited, a company engaged in the manufacture and sale of alcoholic beverages, filed a writ petition challenging a...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Decree-Holder's Petition Under Article 227 in Execution Proceedings — Order XXI Rule 41 CPC Mandates Judgment-Debtor to File Affidavit of Assets. The Court held that the Commercial Court erred in dismissing the application for asset disclosure without considering the mandatory nature of Order XXI Rule 41 CPC.

30 Jul 2025

The petitioner, Ms. Sumita Abhishek Sundaram, is the decree-holder in a commercial execution proceeding (Com. Ex. 541 of 2024) pending before the LXXX...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals in Commercial Summary Suit Cases — Triable Issues Raised on Guarantee and Limitation. Court holds that existence of disputed facts regarding limitation and discharge of guarantor requires unconditional leave to defend under Order XXXVII CPC.

22 Sep 2022

The judgment arises from two commercial appeals filed by the defendants against the dismissal of their applications for leave to defend in commercial ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Petition in Execution Proceedings — Attachment of Amount Deposited in Another Suit Not Permissible Without Proper Procedure Under Order 21 Rule 46 CPC. Decree holder cannot bypass execution procedure by seeking attachment of a sum deposited in a different suit under Section 151 CPC without following Order 21 Rule 46 CPC.

19 Jul 2024

The petitioner, Smt. Sarasamma C., filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 21.01.2023 passed ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Application to File Additional Written Statement in Commercial Suit — Petitioner Granted Opportunity to File Additional Written Statement on Payment of Costs of Rs. 10,000/-.

26 Jun 2024

The petitioner, M/s. Rhea Healthcare Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 08.04....

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Enforcement of Foreign Judgment in Bunker Supply Dispute Despite Defendant's Challenges. Danish Supreme Court Judgment Held Conclusive Under Section 13 CPC as Defendant Failed to Prove Exceptions, Resulting in Decree for Balance Amount.

21 Jun 2018

The dispute arose from a bunker supply transaction involving the vessel PFS NARAYANA. Dan Bunkering Limited, a Danish company, supplied bunkers to the...

9 10 11 12 13

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)