Search Results for "Coal supply"

183 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 183 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Money Recovery Suit — Admission of Liability in Written Statement Constitutes Acknowledgment Under Section 18 of Limitation Act, 1963. Suit for Recovery of Money Based on Supply of Goods Held Not Time-Barred Due to Defendant's Admission.

The case involves a suit for recovery of money filed by M/s. Jindal Steels, a partnership firm (plaintiff), against Trident Architectural Aluminium Pr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Framing of Additional Issue in Civil Suit. The court upheld the trial court's order framing an issue on the genuineness of documents, as the defendant had pleaded forgery and the issue was necessary for just adjudication.

The petitioner, the original defendant in Special Civil Suit No. 280 of 2017, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, 19...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Debarment Without Hearing in Pharmaceutical Supply Contract. State's Indefinite Stoppage of Local Purchase from Supplier Based on Criminal Case Against Former Director Held Arbitrary for Violating Principles of Natural Justice.

The appellant, M/s Daffodills Pharmaceuticals Ltd., a pharmaceutical supplier, participated in a tender process called by the State of Uttar Pradesh f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses ONGC's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Casing Pipes Supply Dispute. Liquidated Damages Deduction Set Aside as No Actual Loss Proven Under Section 74 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872.

The case involves a dispute between Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Limited (ONGC), the petitioner, and Oil Country Tubular Limited, the respondent, a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Entertainment Duty on Amusement Park Admission Fee. Lumpsum Charge for Entry and Entertainment is Subject to Duty Under Bombay Entertainment Duty Act, 1923.

The petitioners, Pan India Paryatan Limited and its director, owned and operated an amusement park in Greater Bombay which opened to the public on 25t...