Search Results for "Charitable Purpose"

561 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 561 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Assistant Professor's Challenge to Superannuation at Age 60, Holds AICTE Retirement Age of 65 Applicable to Private Self-Finance Standalone Institution. Goa Institute of Management's Faculty Manual Fixing Retirement Age at 60 is Overridden by AICTE Regulations.

The petitioner, Dr. Vilasini Devi Nair, was appointed as an Assistant Professor at the Goa Institute of Management (GIM), a private self-finance stand...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Revision Applications Against Rejection of Plaint Dismissal in Money Suit. Order VII Rule 11 CPC Application for Rejection of Plaint Dismissed as Plaint Disclosed Cause of Action and Was Not Barred by Law.

The case involves three civil revision applications filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) challenging a common order date...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Will Construction Case — No Substantial Question of Law Found. Interpretation of Will and Codicil Held to Be a Question of Fact, Not Law, Under Section 100 CPC.

The case involves a dispute over the interpretation of a Will and Codicil executed by one Jehangir Bomanji Boman Behram (the testator), a wealthy soli...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Will Construction Case — No Substantial Question of Law Found. Interpretation of Will and Codicil Held to Be a Question of Fact, Not Law, Under Section 100 CPC.

The case involves a First Appeal registered as such but to be decided as a Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Cancellation of Mutation Entry for Land Purchased from Public Trust. Mutation entry No.8930 restored as Assistant Collector lacked jurisdiction to cancel it without notice and without challenging the sale deed.

The petitioners, Digambar Hiraman Saraf and others, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court at Aurangabad challenging an order dated 24.12.1990...