Search Results for "Article 102"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Article 102"

1589 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1589 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Challenging Defamation Process in Companies Act Special Notice Case. The Dispute Involves Allegations Made in a Statutory Notice Under the Companies Act, 2013.

22 Jul 2019

Background: The present writ petition arose from a criminal defamation complaint filed by Respondent No.2, Nusli Neville Wadia, against the petitioner...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Batch of Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Notification on Mining Leases; Examines Legislative Competence under Karnataka Forest Act and Forest (Conservation) Act.

3 Dec 2015

A batch of writ petitions was filed before the High Court of Karnataka challenging the validity of Notification No. FEE/23/2007-08 dated 16.08.2008 is...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Karnataka Administrative Tribunal Order in Transport Department Recruitment Matter. Petitions Filed Under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution Seek Quashing of Tribunal's Decision Dated 02.03.2010.

23 Sep 2014

...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Challenge to Induction of Non-Legislator Ministers with Less Than Six Months Remaining in Assembly Term. Conformity of Such Induction with Article 164(4) of the Constitution of India Questioned.

13 Sep 2019

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay heard two writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by Vijay Namdeorao Wadettiwar (a ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Considers Appeal Against Conviction Under Section 5 TADA for Possession of Weapon. Appellant Challenges Recovery Evidence and Disclosure Statement in Bombay Blast Case.

1 Jan 1970

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Batch of Writ Petitions by Bar/Restaurant Licensees Against Non-Renewal of CL-9 Excise Licenses. Petitions Challenge Communications Issued by Excise Authorities and Seek Directions to Renew Licenses.

22 Aug 2017

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Division Bench Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging the Validity of State Notification Imposing Forest Development Tax on Mining Leases. The Petitioners Seek Declaration that the Notification is Ultra Vires the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 and the Constitution.

3 Dec 2015

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Division Bench Answers Referred Questions on Adequacy of Protection Under Section 52 of Transfer of Property Act and Grant of Interim Injunctions. The Court Examined Whether Section 52 TP Act Provides Sufficient Safeguard to Deny Injunction Pendente Lite and the Role of Notice Registration Under Section 18 of the Indian Registration Act.

4 Oct 2016

The appeal arose from an order of the Trial Court rejecting the appellant's application for temporary injunction in a suit for specific performance of...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Contempt Petition Alleging Non-Compliance with Criminal Antecedent Disclosure Directions in Bihar Legislative Assembly Elections. Election Commission's Report Showed Substantial Compliance by Political Parties with Supreme Court's Mandate Under Articles 129 and 142 of Constitution of India.

10 Aug 2021

The Supreme Court considered a contempt petition filed by an advocate alleging willful disobedience of the court's directions regarding disclosure of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Trial Court Order Refusing to Strike Out Defence for Non-Payment of Interim Rent Under Section 13(2) of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999. The Court Held That the Provision for Striking Out Defence Is Discretionary and Not Mandatory, and the Trial Court's Discretion Should Not Be Interfered With Unless Perverse.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioners, seven cooperative housing societies, filed a writ petition challenging an order of the trial court dated 30th April 2013, which rejec...

9 10 11 12 13

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)