Search Results for "Arbitral Tribunal Jurisdiction"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Arbitral Tribunal Jurisdiction"

1515 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1515 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines Validity of Arbitration Reference and Anti-Suit Injunction in Wind Turbine Technology Licensing Dispute. The Core Issue Revolves Around Whether an Unincorporated IPLA Constitutes a Binding Arbitration Agreement Under Section 45 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

5 Oct 2012

The dispute arose from a joint venture between Enercon (India) Ltd. and its directors (Petitioners) and Enercon GmbH and Wobben Properties GmbH (Respo...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Arbitration Petition Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Claim for Refund of Membership Fees Dismissed as Barred by Limitation and Not Arbitrable. Court Holds That Arbitral Tribunal's Findings on Limitation and Merits Are Not Patently Illegal or in Conflict with Public Policy.

27 Oct 2015

The petitioners, Jain Social Group, Nashik (an association of Jain individuals) and its member Mohan K. Bagmar, filed an arbitration petition under Se...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Arbitration Application Due to Non-Existence of Arbitration Agreement — No Prima Facie Case for Reference to Arbitration Under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

14 Jul 2026

The applicant, Unistar Metals Private Limited, filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking reference ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Setting Aside Order Refusing Appointment of Arbitrator. Court holds that non-payment of stamp duty on agreement does not render arbitration agreement void ab initio, and that the issue of stamping is for the arbitrator to decide under Section 11(6A) of the Act.

10 Nov 2025

The appellant, Iqbal Trading Company, filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an order dated Octob...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Appointment Case — Issue of Accord and Satisfaction to be Decided by Arbitrator Under Section 11(6A) of Arbitration Act, 1996. The Court held that the High Court erred in refusing appointment on ground of full and final settlement, as the limited jurisdiction under Section 11(6A) only permits examination of existence of arbitration agreement.

5 May 2023

The appellant, M/s. Shree Vishnu Constructions, entered into an agreement with the respondents (Military Engineering Service) on 22.07.2010 for constr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Enforces Foreign Arbitral Award in Favor of Singapore Seller Against Indian Buyer. Rejects Objections Based on Conflicting Jurisdiction Clauses and Public Policy Under Section 48 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

4 Feb 2013

The petitioner, M/s. Louis Dreyfus Commodities Asia Pte Ltd., a Singapore-based company, filed a petition under Sections 47 and 48 of the Arbitration ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Tribunal's Procedural Order on Discovery — Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Does Not Permit Challenge to Procedural Orders, Only Final Awards.

18 Nov 2010

The case involves a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by Tata Industries Limited and another against Gras...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act Seeking Modification of Interest Award — Arbitral Tribunal's Discretion on Interest Rate and Period Not Interfered With

24 Sep 2012

The Petitioner, IMC Limited (formerly United Storage & Tank Terminals Ltd.), filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals Against Remand Order in Arbitration Matters — Single Judge Exceeded Jurisdiction Under Section 34 by Setting Aside Award and Remanding for Reconsideration Without Finding Award to Be Void or Inoperative. The Court Held That Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Does Not Confer Power of Remand; Only Remedies Are to Uphold, Modify, or Set Aside the Award.

25 Jun 2013

The appellant, Geojit Financial Services Limited (now Geojit BNP Paribas Financial Services Limited), a stock broker registered with the National Stoc...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Adjudicates Petitions Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act Against Interim Deposit Order. The Arbitral Tribunal Had Directed Joint and Several Deposit of Rs.190 Crores and Restraint on Property Alienation.

3 Jan 2019

The dispute arose from a Share Holders Agreement (SHA) dated 27 December 2012 and subsequent amendments between the Claimants (investors) and the Resp...

9 10 11 12 13

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)