Search Results for "statutory recognition"

1570 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1570 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes University's Withdrawal of Affiliation for Non-Compliance with Natural Justice. Affiliation Withdrawal Without Show Cause Notice Violates Principles of Natural Justice Under Maharashtra Public Trust Act, 1950.

The petitioner, Nisargadeep Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, is an educational trust registered under the Maharashtra Public Trust Act, 1950, running Shri Tu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition in Service Matter — Denies Reinstatement as Wireman Due to Lack of Evidence. Petitioner failed to prove he was a wireman and not a helper; termination justified as per settlement terms.

The petitioner, Sakhawat Ibrahim Naik, filed a Writ Petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the judgment and orde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Termination of Assistant Teacher in Private Aided School — Violation of Natural Justice and Section 5 of M.E.P.S. Act, 1977. Termination order set aside as no prior approval was obtained from the Education Officer before dismissal.

The petitioner, Vijaykumar Raosaheb Kulkarni, was an assistant teacher employed by the Rasta Peth Education Society, which runs a private aided school...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Forest Department Challenging Industrial Court Order Granting Permanency to Daily Wage Workers. The Industrial Court's order directing grant of permanency to workers engaged for years as daily wagers was upheld as no error of jurisdiction or perversity was found.

The Deputy Conservator of Forest, Nashik Van Vibhag (E), Nasik and others (petitioners) filed a Writ Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order of Reinstatement with Back Wages. Termination of Employee Without Domestic Inquiry or Retrenchment Compensation Held Illegal Under Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The petitioner, Mutha Founders Pvt Ltd, challenged the judgment and order dated 05.11.2012 passed by the learned Industrial Court, Satara in Complaint...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Caste Scrutiny Committee's Invalidity Orders in Thakar Tribe Certificate Cases. Held that the Committee failed to consider relevant documents and applied incorrect principles, violating principles of natural justice.

The judgment concerns four writ petitions filed by members of the Chitale family challenging orders of the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Verification Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Employer's Writ Petitions Challenging Labour Court Awards of Reinstatement Without Back Wages. Held that daily wage employees who worked for less than 240 days in a year are not entitled to reinstatement under Section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The judgment involves a batch of writ petitions filed by the employer, Dainik Bhaskar Group (D. B. Corp Ltd), challenging the awards of the Labour Cou...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Impleadment of Trust in Writ Petition Concerning Educational Institution Management. Beneficiary of Trust Held Entitled to Be Heard Before Final Order Affecting Trust Property.

The case involves an Interim Application (L) No.1063 of 2021 filed by Rao Educational Trust seeking impleadment in a pending Writ Petition (L) No.2331...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Import of Peas Under Restricted Category Based on Pre-Notification Contracts. Petitioners' goods cleared as contracts entered prior to amendment notification dated 29.03.2019 under Section 3 of Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992.

The petitioners, M/s. Harihar Collections and M/s. Raj Grow Impex LLP, are engaged in the import and export of agricultural commodities. They imported...