Search Results for "deemed payment"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "deemed payment"

5595 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5595 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Possessors to Pay Decretal Amount to Avoid Auction in Execution Proceedings. Decree Holder Cannot Insist on Auction When Possessor Willing to Satisfy Decree Under Order 21 Rules 64 and 83 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

6 Jun 2011

The petitioners, Lalit Malick, Shyam Malick, and Madhu Bhatti, filed a writ petition challenging the execution proceedings of a decree passed in Comme...

High Court

Bombay High Court Reviews Writ Petitions Challenging CIDCO's Cancellation of Lease Allotments for Alleged Non-Payment of Delayed Payment Charges. The Court Considered Whether Acceptance of Delayed Payments Without Protest Constituted Waiver of Delayed Payment Charges and Whether Cancellation of Allotments Was Justified.

28 Sep 2021

The dispute arose from three writ petitions filed before the Bombay High Court challenging the cancellation of lease allotments by CIDCO for allegedly...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Compromise Decree in Property Suit Despite Third-Party Intervention Claim — Consent Terms Binding on Parties, Intervener's Rights Not Affected. The Court held that a compromise between the original parties does not affect the rights of a third party claiming independent title, and such third party need not be impleaded in the suit.

29 Nov 2024

The judgment arises from a suit filed by Vinesh Rashmikant Shah and others (Plaintiffs) against Pee Jay Traders and others (Defendants) concerning dis...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Dismissal Order in Disciplinary Proceeding Due to Non-Payment of Subsistence Allowance. Employer's Failure to Pay Subsistence Allowance During Suspension Renders Enquiry and Consequential Dismissal Void Ab Initio.

6 Oct 2022

The petitioner, Devisingh Sandusingh Rajput, was employed as Manager (Development) with the Marathwada Development Corporation Ltd., a State Governmen...

High Court

WRIT PETITION NO.5186 OF 2001

1 Jan 1970

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Stamp Duty Demand on Development Agreement — Karnataka Appellate Tribunal's Order Set Aside for Lack of Proper Consideration of Evidence and Non-Application of Mind to the Definition of 'Conveyance' Under the Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957.

5 Aug 2019

The petitioners, M/s. Motwani Builders and M/s. B. Alim Builders, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challen...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Forum for Trial in SEBI Act Cases — Retrospective Application of 2002 and 2014 Amendments Disputed. Court Considers Whether Change from Magistrate to Sessions Court and Subsequent Special Courts Affects Pre‑2002 Offences Still Pending.

1 Jan 1970

This batch of appeals and petitions before the Supreme Court concerned the proper forum for trial of offences under the Securities and Exchange Board ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Regulatory Appeal on Trial Forum under Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992. Procedural Amendment to Section 26 by the 2002 Amendment Act Held Retrospective, and All Pending Trials for Pre-2002 Offences Must Proceed Before Special Court as per the 2014 Amendment.

1 Aug 2026

The Supreme Court addressed a batch of appeals and writ petitions concerning the correct forum for trial of offences under the Securities and Exchange...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Quashes Compounding Fee Demand Under Section 96(4) of Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 for Want of Prior Conversion of Patta Land. Quarrying Activity Commenced When Law Did Not Require Conversion as per Shakeel Pasha v. N. Sivasailam, Hence No Violation of Section 95.

2 Aug 2013

The petitioner, a mineral company holding three quarrying licences granted in 2000 and 2002 for extraction of pink granite on patta agricultural lands...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Quashes Demand for Deficit Stamp Duty Under Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957: Conditional Possession Undertaking Not a Usufructuary Mortgage. Mortgage Deed with Clause to Hand Over Possession on Default Held Chargeable as Simple Mortgage, Not Under Article 34(a) of Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957.

5 Aug 2019

The petitioners, a landowner and a builder, entered into a joint development agreement and subsequently executed a mortgage deed in favour of a bank t...

107 108 109 110 111

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)