Search Results for "arbitral tribunal jurisdiction"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "arbitral tribunal jurisdiction"

1546 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1546 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Dealership Dispute — Holds Arbitrator Exceeded Jurisdiction by Awarding Damages Without Proper Evidence. The court found that the respondent's failure to collect goods caused the loss, and termination for supplying spurious goods was valid under the dealership agreement.

7 Feb 2019

The case involves cross arbitration petitions challenging an arbitral award arising from a dealership agreement between NOD Bearings Pvt. Ltd. (petiti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Arbitration Appointment Case — No Error Apparent on Record. Court holds that review jurisdiction under Section 114 CPC is limited to errors apparent on the face of the record and cannot be used to re-argue the merits of the case.

10 Dec 2025

The petitioner, Sayla Realtors, filed a review petition before the Bombay High Court seeking review of an order dated September 25, 2025. By that orde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows MTNL's Challenge to Arbitral Award in False Ceiling Contract Dispute. Court Upholds Award on Certain Claims but Sets Aside Award on Claim for Price Escalation Due to Lack of Evidence and Contrary to Contract Terms.

13 Feb 2015

The petitioner, Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. (MTNL), challenged an arbitral award dated 29 March 2011 under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Concil...

High Court

High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Commercial Court Order on Arbitration Time Extension Application. Commercial Court Erred in Declining Jurisdiction Over Section 29A Application Based on Arbitrator Appointment Method Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

12 Mar 2026

The dispute arose from a writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 22.08.2025 passed by t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Ex Parte Arbitral Award for Violation of Natural Justice — Petitioner Denied Opportunity to Present Case Due to Insufficient Notice of Arbitration Proceedings. The court held that the arbitrator's failure to ensure proper service and grant adjournment before proceeding ex parte violated principles of natural justice under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

23 Mar 2015

The petitioner, Rajnikant B. Vora, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an ex parte arbitral a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Interim Application to Set Aside Ex-Parte Arbitral Award Due to Lack of Proper Service and Violation of Natural Justice. Service by email without proof of delivery and newspaper publication without court permission is insufficient under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

31 Mar 2021

The case involves an application under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by the respondents in the arbitration (applican...

High Court

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award for Violation of Natural Justice in Cooperative Bank Election Dispute. Arbitrator's Ex-Parte Order Setting Aside Nomination Without Notice to Petitioner Violates Section 84 of Multi-State Cooperative Societies Act, 2002.

18 Apr 2013

The Petitioner, Mohammed Amin Haroon Solkar, a member of Kokan Mercantile Cooperative Bank Ltd. (Respondent No.4), challenged an arbitral award dated ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Interim Orders Under Section 9 of Arbitration Act — Orders Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Pre-Arbitration Procedure. The court held that the learned Principal District Judge lacked jurisdiction to grant interim relief under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, as the applicant failed to comply with the mandatory pre-arbitration conciliation procedure agreed upon in the contract.

6 Jun 2017

The petitioners, Mineira Nacional Limitada and others, filed a writ petition challenging two orders dated 13.01.2016 and 29.11.2016 passed by the lear...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Execution of Arbitral Award. Objections to Award Not Raised Under Section 34 Cannot Be Raised in Execution Proceedings Under Section 36 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

11 Jun 2018

The appellant, DoIt Computer JV, a joint venture company, was a registered contractor of the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (respondent). Dis...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Dealership Dispute Over Supply of Spurious Bearings and Non-Delivery. Court Upholds Termination for Breach of Implied Warranty of Genuineness but Remits Damages for Non-Delivery for Reconsideration.

7 Feb 2019

The judgment concerns cross arbitration petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award arisin...

107 108 109 110 111

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)