Search Results for "municipal purpose"

4633 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4633 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Allows State Appeal Against Acquittal in Theft and Public Property Damage Case — Defective Investigation Cannot Be Sole Ground for Acquittal. Trial Court Must Appreciate Evidence Dehors Investigation Defects to Determine if Case is Made Out Against Accused.

The State of Goa appealed against the acquittal of Dadasaheb Rane, a market inspector of Bicholim Municipal Council (BMC), who was charged with theft ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Heard Multiple Commercial Appeals Involving Interim Applications in Arbitration Petitions. Appellants Challenged Orders in Commercial Arbitration Petitions Against a Partnership Firm and Its Partners.

These matters are commercial appeals filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction. The appeals arise out ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order Granting Permanency to Workmen. Employer Failed to Prove Compliance with Section 25-F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, and Workmen Had Completed 240 Days of Service.

The petitioner, Raymond UCO Denim Private Ltd., challenged the order dated 1.1.2009 passed by the Industrial Court, Yavatmal in ULP Complaint No.27 of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition by Society Members Against Unauthorized Construction and Demolition by Developer. Members have locus standi to challenge illegal construction; administrator must act lawfully.

The petitioners, who are members of the Linking Road Housing Society Limited, filed a writ petition challenging the unauthorized construction and demo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Heard PIL Challenging Development Permissions for Star Hotel in No Development Zone. The Court Considered Whether UDD Approval Under Regulation 59(3) and Additional FSI of 1.0 Were Valid Under DCRs and MRTP Act.

The case arose from a public interest litigation filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay. T...