Search Results for "individual income"

1710 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1710 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Insolvency Notice Against Partners Not Impleaded in Suit — Leave Under Order 21 Rule 50(2) CPC Required. Insolvency Notice Against Alleged Partners Without Prior Leave Under Order 21 Rule 50(2) CPC is Invalid as It Is a Step in Execution.

The judgment debtors, M/s. Shiva Trading Corporation (a firm) and its alleged partners Gulab S. Daga and Jatin Devi Daga, filed a motion to set aside ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Workman's Petition Challenging Industrial Court's Order Dismissing Complaint for Non-Implementation of Award. Delay of 4½ years in filing complaint under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971 held fatal as no sufficient cause shown.

The petitioner, Kashinath Parvati Labade, was a workman employed with the Department of Social Forestry, Maharashtra. He was allegedly illegally termi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Cooperative Society Bye-Law Amendment for Lack of Quorum and Procedural Irregularities. Amendment to Bye-Law 24(c) restricting voting rights to one member per family set aside as resolution passed without requisite quorum and without proper notice.

The petitioners, Uday Dalal, Ajay Biyani, Rina Pritish Nandy, and Prachi Agarwal, are members of the Malboro House Coop. Housing Society Limited, a co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Goa Children's Act, 2003 as Premature. Petitioner Convicted for Kidnapping and Murder of Minor Cannot Challenge State Legislation When Appeal Against Conviction is Pending.

The petitioner, Rohan Pradeep Dhungat, was convicted by the Goa Children's Court in Special Case No.28/2006 for offences including kidnapping for rans...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Contract Dispute for Lack of Merit. Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenge fails as no patent illegality or perversity found in award rejecting damages for breach of contract.

The present petition was filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award dated 25th March 2021 pas...