Search Results for "cross examination"

9990 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 9990 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Writ Petition Against Order of Industrial Court in Unfair Labour Practice Complaint Under MRTU & PULP Act. The petition challenged the order directing reinstatement and backwages on grounds of lack of jurisdiction and violation of natural justice.

The writ petition challenged the order dated 28/02/2025 passed by the Industrial Court, Maharashtra at Jalna in Complaint ULP No. 225/2019. The Indust...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony of Prosecutrix and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(2)(i)(n) IPC and Section 4 POCSO Act set aside as evidence of victim was unreliable and medical evidence did not support prosecution case.

The appellant, Mr. Sayyad Chand Agasapure, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur, for offences under Section 376(2)(i)(n) of the Ind...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case involves two criminal appeals arising from a judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge-3, Beed, in Sessions Case No.40/2011, dated 10.10.2011...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) Hears Criminal Appeals Against Conviction for Dowry Death and Cruelty. Appeals Challenge Reliability of Evidence and Medical Findings in Case Involving Alleged Murder by Husband and In‑Laws.

The appeals arose from the judgment and order dated 20 April 2013 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Hingoli in Sessions Trial No. 63 of 2011, c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) Decides Criminal Appeals Against Conviction and Acquittal in Land Dispute Murder Case. Convicted Accused Under Sections 147, 148, 302, 324, 325 read with 149 IPC and Section 135 Bombay Police Act Appeal; State Challenges Acquittal of Co-Accused on Same Charges.

The case arose from a land dispute in village Yelamwadi, Tq. Chakur, Dist. Latur. Muktabai, the complainant, lived with her husband and children. Her ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Confirmation Case and Criminal Appeal in Death Sentence Matter — Dying Declarations and Circumstantial Evidence Discussed.

The matter involved confirmation of death sentence under Section 368 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and a criminal appeal against conviction ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Confirms Death Sentence for Accused in Triple Murder Case — Circumstantial Evidence and Motive Establish Guilt. Accused Raju Birha Convicted Under Section 302 IPC for Murder of Three Persons, Death Penalty Upheld as Rarest of Rare Case.

The case pertains to the conviction of Raju Birha for the murder of three persons, Sunil Kotangale, Kailash Bahadure, and Golu @ Ashish Gaikwad, under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court confirmed conviction of Accused in Murder Case Due to reliable Evidence and Procedures. Conviction under Section 302 IPC sustained as prosecution proved guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appeal arose from a conviction under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of the appellant's wife, sentenced to life imprisonment. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Seven Accused in Murder Case Under Section 302 IPC Read with Section 149 IPC. Land Dispute Led to Fatal Attack, Eyewitness Testimony and Medical Evidence Found Credible.

The judgment pertains to two appeals arising from the same incident: Criminal Appeal No.936 of 2003 filed by seven convicted accused challenging their...