Search Results for "contract void"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "contract void"

1856 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1856 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Specific Performance of Sale Agreement in Cross Appeals — Upholds Trial Court Decree for Execution of Sale Deed. Agreement to Sell for Rs. 17,000 with Rs. 13,275 Earnest Money and Possession Delivered; Defendant's Refusal to Execute Sale Deed Despite Plaintiff's Readiness and Williness.

11 Jan 2010

The case involves two cross appeals arising from a suit for specific performance of contract. The plaintiff, Haji Begum, filed Regular Civil Suit No. ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Setting Aside of Arbitral Award for Being Beyond Stipulated Time — Arbitration Clause Mandates Award Within Four Months of Entering Reference, Failure Renders Award Void.

2 May 2012

The appeal arose from an order of a learned single Judge of the Bombay High Court setting aside an arbitral award dated 17th August 2006 on the ground...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Chamber Summons to Raise Attachment Under Order 21 Rule 54 CPC — Bona Fide Purchaser for Value Without Notice of Decree Protected. The court held that an attachment order served after the purchaser had paid full consideration and obtained possession is not binding on the purchaser.

6 Apr 2005

The present chamber summons was taken out by the applicant, Rajneesh Agarwal & Associates P. Ltd, seeking to raise an attachment under Order 21 Rule 5...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement Not Signed by Plaintiff Renders Suit Unenforceable. The court held that an agreement to sell not signed by the plaintiff seeking specific performance cannot be enforced, setting aside the decrees of the lower courts.

2 Feb 2005

The case involves a second appeal before the Bombay High Court arising from a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell. The original plai...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding-Up Petition Under Sections 433 and 434 of Companies Act, 1956 — Guarantee Debt Disputed on Grounds of Foreign Law and Lack of Service of Statutory Notice. Court holds that a winding-up petition based on a guarantee governed by Malaysian law cannot be adjudicated summarily without proof of debt under Indian law and proper service of demand notice.

27 Jan 2006

The case involves a winding-up petition filed by Malaysian International Trading Corporation Sdn Bhd and another (the petitioners) against Mega Safe D...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Sets Aside Rejection of Section 8 Application. Development Agreement Contains Valid Arbitration Clause, Disputes Must Be Referred to Arbitration.

4 Nov 2025

The Appellant, Om Swayambhu Siddhivinayak, filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an order dated ...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Civil Revision Application Challenging Rejection of Plaint Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC. The court upheld the Trial Court's decision, finding that objections based on Order II Rule 2 CPC, want of cause of action, and limitation require evidence and trial, not summary rejection under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

24 Apr 2026

The dispute arose from a development agreement and subsequent sale deed concerning 32 plots in Latur. The plaintiff, a co-owner, entered into a develo...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Benami Transaction Not Proved. Suit for declaration and possession decreed as plaintiff established title through sale deed and possession, while defendant failed to prove that property was purchased benami in plaintiff's name.

31 Mar 2023

The appellant-defendant Mahadev filed a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) challenging the concurrent judgment...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Resolution Declaring Petitioner Ineligible to Bid for Sand Blocks in Palguni River — Violation of Principles of Natural Justice. Failure to Provide Show Cause Notice Before Blacklisting Petitioner Renders Resolution Void.

25 Sep 2023

The petitioner, Sri Rajeeva, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at Benga...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Section 11 Application to Appoint Arbitrator in BPCL Contract Dispute — Unilateral Appointment Clause Invalid Under Section 12(5) of Arbitration Act. The court held that an arbitration clause giving one party the sole right to appoint an arbitrator is invalid under Section 12(5) read with the Seventh Schedule of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and appointed an independent arbitrator.

26 May 2017

The applicant, DBM Geotechnics & Constructions Pvt Ltd (DBM), filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, see...

106 107 108 109 110

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)