Search Results for "special land acquisition officer"

2085 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2085 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Claimant's Appeal and Dismisses Acquiring Body's Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Market Value Determined at Rs.3,61,000 per Hectare Based on Sale Deed of Similar Land.

The case involves two appeals arising from a land acquisition matter. The claimant, Suresh Govinda Kalwaghe, owned 1 hectare of land in Gat No. 388, w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Delivers Judgment in Public Interest Litigation No. 47 of 2013 Regarding Change of Land Use and Allotment. The court examined the validity of modifying user of a plot from public utility to commercial and the subsequent allotment to a trust.

This Public Interest Litigation (PIL) was filed by Citizen Forum For Equality, a registered NGO, challenging the modification of user of a plot in the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Appeals in Land Acquisition Case — Enhances Compensation for Agricultural Land with Non-Agricultural Potential. Multiplier Method Applied to Determine Market Value Under Section 23 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The case involves two first appeals filed by the claimants, Ganpat Laxman Vesmode and Ahmedsahab Abdulsaab, against the judgment and award dated 30th ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Reference Rejection Set Aside Due to Procedural Error. Power of Attorney Holder Entitled to Maintain Reference Under Section 54(1) of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The appellant, Santosh S. Nayak, as Power of Attorney holder of the land owner Manappa Ramappa Lamani, filed a reference under Section 18 of the Land ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Property Partition Suit — Upholds Trial Court's Refusal to Reopen Consent Terms. Consent Terms Recorded in Earlier Suit Are Binding and Cannot Be Reopened Without Proof of Fraud or Collusion Under Order 23 Rule 3 of CPC.

The appellant, Mrs. Geeta Patkar, filed First Appeal No. 18 of 2014 against the judgment and order of the trial court in Special Civil Suit No. 55 of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Enhances Compensation for Land Acquisition in Nanded — Market Value Determined Based on Sale Deeds and Potential for Development. Belting Method Applied to Differentiate Land Abutting Road; Severance Damages, Solatium, and Interest Awarded Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The appellants, original claimants, owned agricultural land in village Jigla, Tq. Biloli, Dist. Nanded, which was acquired by the State of Maharashtra...