Search Results for "mandatory FIR"

1117 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1117 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Unreliable Age Determination. Conviction under Section 6 of POCSO Act and Section 376(2)(i)(n) IPC set aside as victim's age not proved beyond reasonable doubt and medical evidence inconsistent with alleged rape.

The appellant, Manikanta @ Puli, was convicted by the I Additional Sessions Judge and Special Judge, Chikkamagaluru, in Spl.C.(PCSOA) No.10/2017 for o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Accused in Rash Driving Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Absence of Credible Witnesses. Conviction under Sections 279, 337, 304A IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The revision petitioner, Satish Ganapati Gunagi, was convicted by the JMFC, Ankola in C.C. No. 62/2007 for offences under Sections 279 (rash driving),...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition to Cancel Bail in Rape Case — Petitioner Fails to Show Misuse of Bail or Violation of Conditions. The court held that cancellation of bail under Section 439(2) Cr.P.C. requires supervening circumstances or misuse of liberty, not mere change of opinion.

The petitioner, Shabanna Taj, filed a criminal petition under Section 439(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) seeking cancellation of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Order for Specimen Signature in Cheating Case — Section 311A Cr.P.C. Application After Charge Sheet Not Maintainable. Court holds that application under Section 311A Cr.P.C. for specimen handwriting can only be made during investigation, not after filing of charge sheet.

The petitioner, Vinod Kumar, was an accused in Crime No.9/2020 registered at Yapaladinni Police Station for offences under Sections 420, 468, 470 and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Police Action and Reference for Contempt in Lalita Kumari Compliance Case. Court holds that petitioner failed to demonstrate any violation of directions in Lalita Kumari v. State of U.P. and that the Chief Judicial Magistrate's order was not perverse.

The petitioner, Vishwas Sudhanshu Bhamburkar, filed a Special Criminal Application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India read with S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witnesses. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Section 161 IPC and Section 5(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The State of Gujarat filed an appeal under Section 378(1)(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, against the judgment and order of acquittal date...