Madras High Court Allows Accused to Resume Work Abroad in Dowry Harassment Case — Condition of Surrender of Passport Modified. Court held that the right to livelihood under Article 21 of the Constitution must be balanced with the need to secure the presence of the accused, and permitted the petitioner to travel to Libya subject to conditions including furnishing a surety and reporting to the Indian Embassy.

High Court: Madras High Court In Favour of Accused
  • 88
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, D. Sathishkumar, is the accused in a case registered under Sections 494 and 498A of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) based on a complaint by his wife, S. Vasanthi (the de facto complainant). The complaint was initially registered as Crime No. 364 of 2022 at Vazhappadi Police Station. Due to ineffective investigation, the de facto complainant filed Crl.O.P. No. 15031 of 2025 seeking transfer of investigation, and the High Court transferred the investigation to the CBCID, Salem, on 12.08.2024. The complaint was re-registered as Crime No. 2 of 2025 on 08.02.2025. After investigation, a final report was filed on 29.07.2025 before the Judicial Magistrate No. 4, Salem, and taken on file as C.C. No. 1170 of 2025 under Sections 494 and 498A IPC. The petitioner was absconding and staying abroad, leading to the issuance of a Blue Corner Notice and Lookout Circular. He was deported to India and arrested on 25.03.2025 at Bombay Airport, then remanded to judicial custody. He was later enlarged on bail with conditions. The petitioner filed an application (Crl.M.P. No. 2566 of 2025) seeking permission to resume his duty in Libya. The learned Magistrate dismissed the application on 19.01.2026 on the ground that the petitioner had not disclosed the statutory basis for maintainability and that the application was a replication of an earlier application (Crl.M.P. No. 3863 of 2025). Aggrieved, the petitioner filed the present Criminal Revision Case under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS). The High Court heard the parties. The petitioner argued that he had a job in Libya and needed to travel to support his family, and that his right to livelihood under Article 21 of the Constitution should be considered. The respondents opposed, citing the seriousness of the allegations and the risk of absconding. The court analyzed the issue, noting that the petitioner had already been granted bail and that the conditions of bail could be modified under Section 528 BNSS. The court held that the right to livelihood is a facet of Article 21 and must be balanced with the need to secure the accused's presence. The court allowed the revision petition, set aside the impugned order, and permitted the petitioner to travel to Libya subject to conditions: (i) the petitioner shall surrender his passport before the trial court and obtain it back for travel; (ii) he shall furnish a surety of Rs. 1,00,000 to the satisfaction of the trial court; (iii) he shall report to the Indian Embassy in Libya once a month; (iv) he shall return to India within six months or as directed by the trial court; and (v) he shall not tamper with evidence or influence witnesses.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure - Bail Conditions - Travel Abroad - Right to Livelihood - The court considered whether an accused can be permitted to travel abroad for employment pending trial. The court held that the right to livelihood under Article 21 of the Constitution must be balanced with the need to secure the presence of the accused. The court allowed the petitioner to travel to Libya subject to conditions including furnishing a surety of Rs. 1,00,000 and reporting to the Indian Embassy in Libya once a month. (Paras 4-6)

B) Criminal Procedure - Maintainability of Application - Section 528 BNSS - The court held that the application for permission to travel abroad is maintainable under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), which empowers the court to modify bail conditions. The impugned order dismissing the application on the ground of lack of statutory backup was set aside. (Paras 4-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner, an accused in a case under Sections 494 and 498A IPC, can be permitted to travel abroad to resume his employment in Libya, and whether the impugned order dismissing his application for such permission is sustainable.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Criminal Revision Case is allowed. The impugned order dated 19.01.2026 in Crl.MP.No.2566/2025 is set aside. The petitioner is permitted to travel to Libya subject to conditions: (i) surrender passport and obtain it back for travel; (ii) furnish surety of Rs. 1,00,000; (iii) report to Indian Embassy in Libya once a month; (iv) return to India within six months or as directed; (v) not tamper with evidence or influence witnesses.

Law Points

  • Right to livelihood
  • Article 21 of the Constitution
  • Bail conditions
  • Travel abroad
  • Section 528 BNSS
  • Section 494 IPC
  • Section 498A IPC
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026:MHC:1853

CRL RC No. 462 of 2026

2026-06-01

C. Kumarappan

2026:MHC:1853

Mr. N. Manoharan (for petitioner), Mr. R. Kishore Kumar (Govt. Advocate for R1), Mr. T. Sundaravadanam (for R2)

D. Sathishkumar

State Rep. by The Inspector of Police, Crime Branch CID, OCU, Salem; S. Vasanthi

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal Revision Case against dismissal of application seeking permission to travel abroad for employment.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought to set aside the order dated 19.01.2026 dismissing his application for permission to resume work in Libya.

Filing Reason

The petitioner's application to travel to Libya for employment was dismissed by the Magistrate on grounds of lack of statutory basis and being a replication of an earlier application.

Previous Decisions

The petitioner was enlarged on bail with conditions; earlier application Crl.MP.No.3863 of 2025 was dismissed on 19.01.2026.

Issues

Whether the application for permission to travel abroad is maintainable under Section 528 BNSS? Whether the petitioner should be permitted to travel to Libya for employment pending trial?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that he has a job in Libya and needs to travel to support his family; right to livelihood under Article 21. Respondents opposed citing seriousness of allegations and risk of absconding.

Ratio Decidendi

The right to livelihood under Article 21 of the Constitution is a fundamental right and must be balanced with the need to secure the presence of the accused. The court has power under Section 528 BNSS to modify bail conditions to permit travel abroad for employment, subject to appropriate safeguards.

Judgment Excerpts

The present Criminal Revision Case is filed against the orders passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.IV, Salem in Crl.MP.No.2566 of 2025, in which the petitioner seeks for a prayer to allow him to resume work in Libya. The court held that the right to livelihood under Article 21 of the Constitution must be balanced with the need to secure the presence of the accused.

Procedural History

Complaint under Section 498A IPC registered as Crime No. 364 of 2022; investigation transferred to CBCID by High Court on 12.08.2024; re-registered as Crime No. 2 of 2025; final report filed on 29.07.2025; taken on file as C.C. No. 1170 of 2025; petitioner arrested on 25.03.2025; enlarged on bail; application for travel abroad dismissed on 19.01.2026; present revision filed.

Acts & Sections

  • Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023: 528
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 494, 498A
  • Constitution of India: Article 21
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Doubtful Testimony and Parity with Acquitted Co-Accused. Conviction under Section 302 IPC read with Section 149 IPC set aside as evidence of interested witnesses was inconsistent and omnibus.
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Allows Accused to Resume Work Abroad in Dowry Harassment Case — Condition of Surrender of Passport Modified. Court held that the right to livelihood under Article 21 of the Constitution must be balanced with the need to secure the...