Search Results for "Excise Commissioner"

1658 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1658 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition Quashing Detention Order Due to Unexplained Delay. Unexplained delay of 51 days between arrest and detention order under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 snaps live link, rendering detention invalid.

The petitioner, Thiru Masthan, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the detention order dated 02....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition in Drug Offender Case Due to Inordinate Delay — Detention Order Quashed as Live and Proximate Link Snapped. Unexplained delay of 46 days between arrest and detention order renders subjective satisfaction doubtful under preventive detention law.

The petitioner, G. Annakili, wife of the detenu Gunasekaran, filed a habeas corpus petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition and Quashes Detention Order Due to Improper Translation of Vital Document. Failure to Supply Remand Extension Order in Language Understood by Detenu Violates Article 22(5) of the Constitution and Right to Make Effective Representation.

The petitioner, Kamatchi, mother of the detenu Prakash, filed a habeas corpus petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Closes Habeas Corpus Petition After Detention Order Revoked by Competent Authority. The court held that revocation of the detention order rendered the petition infructuous, and no further adjudication was necessary.

The petitioner, Devi, filed a Habeas Corpus petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madras High Court, challenging the dete...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitions Challenging Validity of Proviso to Section 115JB(6) of Income Tax Act in SEZ Cases. The court held that the proviso inserted by Finance Act, 2011 is not ultra vires the SEZ Act and is valid and enforceable.

The case involves a batch of writ petitions filed by companies operating in Special Economic Zones (SEZs) challenging the constitutional validity of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Closes Writ Petition Seeking Escort for Leave Under Tamil Nadu Suspension of Sentence Rules, 1982 as Matter Became Infructuous. Commissioner of Police, Tiruchirappalli Passed Order on 22.03.2025 Rendering Petition Without Remaining Adjudication.

The petitioner, C. Selvam, a convicted prisoner, was granted leave under the Tamil Nadu Suspension of Sentence Rules, 1982. To avail such leave, polic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Telecom Companies' Appeals, Upholding Tax Deduction at Source Under Section 194H on Discounts to Distributors. Relationship Between Telecom Companies and Distributors Held to Be Principal-Agent, Making Discounts Liable as Commission for Tax Deduction Purposes.

Multiple telecom companies, including Bharti Airtel Limited, Vodafone Essar South Limited, and Tata Teleservices Limited, filed appeals under Section ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Telecom Companies' Appeals on Section 194H TDS Liability Against Distributors. Discounts to Channel Partners Held as Commission, Mandating Tax Deduction Under Agency Relationship.

The High Court of Karnataka heard a batch of appeals by telecom companies challenging Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders confirming their liability ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay, Nagpur Bench, Combined Multiple Writ Petitions by Teachers and Private Schools Against State Education Authorities. The Petitions Pertain to Grievances Related to School Education and Sports Department.

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, heard a combined group of 26 writ petitions (W.P. Nos. 7441, 5633, 5464, 7393, 5866, 6333, 4010,...