Madras High Court Closes Writ Petition Seeking Escort for Leave Under Tamil Nadu Suspension of Sentence Rules, 1982 as Matter Became Infructuous. Commissioner of Police, Tiruchirappalli Passed Order on 22.03.2025 Rendering Petition Without Remaining Adjudication.

High Court: Madras High Court Bench: Madurai
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, C. Selvam, a convicted prisoner, was granted leave under the Tamil Nadu Suspension of Sentence Rules, 1982. To avail such leave, police escort was necessary, but the respondents, including the State of Tamil Nadu and police authorities, failed to provide it. Consequently, the petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court, seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to forthwith provide the required escort. During the pendency of the petition, the Commissioner of Police, Tiruchirappalli, passed an order on 22.03.2025 that effectively resolved the petitioner's grievance. When the matter came up for hearing on 24.03.2025, the learned counsel for the petitioner and the Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondents brought this development to the notice of the court. After hearing both sides and perusing the materials, the Division Bench, comprising Dr. Justice G. Jayachandran and Justice R. Poornima, observed that nothing survived for further adjudication in the writ petition in view of the said proceedings. Therefore, the court closed the writ petition as infructuous. The order did not go into the merits of the claim nor did it issue any direction regarding the provision of escort. The petition was simply closed on the basis that the grievance had been addressed administratively.

Headnote

A) Writ Petition - Mandamus - Provision of escort for leave under Tamil Nadu Suspension of Sentence Rules, 1982 - Petition closed as infructuous following Commissioner of Police order dated 22.03.2025 - Held that nothing survives for adjudication; writ petition closed (Paras 3-4).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether a writ of mandamus should be issued directing respondents to provide police escort to enable petitioner to avail leave granted under Tamil Nadu Suspension of Sentence Rules, 1982.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Writ Petition closed as nothing survives for adjudication following the order of Commissioner of Police, Tiruchirappalli passed on 22.03.2025.

Law Points

  • Writ petition closed as infructuous after Commissioner of Police passed order
  • no mandamus issued.
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (MAD) (03) 239

W.P(MD)No.7100 of 2025

2025-03-24

Dr. Justice G. Jayachandran, Justice R. Poornima

For Petitioner: Mr. N. Pragalathan; For Respondents: Mr. A. Thiruvadi Kumar, Additional Public Prosecutor

C. Selvam

1. The State of Tamil Nadu, represented by the Secretary to Government, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Secretariat, Chennai – 600 009. 2. The Director General of Police, Dr. Radhakrishnan Salai, Mylapore, Chennai-4. 3. The Commissioner of Police, Trichy City, Trichy. 4. The Additional Director General of Police/Additional Director General of Prison, Whannels Road, Egmore, Chennai.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking writ of mandamus for police escort to avail leave granted under Tamil Nadu Suspension of Sentence Rules, 1982.

Remedy Sought

Direction to respondents to forthwith provide police escort to enable the petitioner to avail the leave granted.

Filing Reason

Petitioner, a convicted prisoner, was granted leave but required police escort which the respondents were not providing.

Issues

Whether a writ of mandamus should be issued directing respondents to provide police escort to enable petitioner to avail leave granted under Tamil Nadu Suspension of Sentence Rules, 1982.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner sought mandamus for escort; Respondents brought to court's notice the Commissioner of Police's order dated 22.03.2025 which resolved the grievance, rendering the petition infructuous.

Judgment Excerpts

In view of the proceedings passed by the Commissioner of Police, Tiruchirappalli vide order, dated 22.03.2025, nothing survives for further adjudication in this Writ petition. Hence the Writ Petition stands closed.

Procedural History

Writ petition filed under Article 226 seeking mandamus; heard on 24.03.2025; during pendency, Commissioner of Police, Tiruchirappalli passed an order on 22.03.2025 resolving the grievance; court closed the petition as infructuous on 24.03.2025.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 226
  • Tamil Nadu Suspension of Sentence Rules, 1982:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Decision in Kerala Private Forests Vesting Case — Certificate of Purchase Under Land Reforms Act is Conclusive Proof of Title and Possession. The Court held that land under personal cultivation with a certificate ...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Bike Taxi Aggregator to Operate Pending Policy Formulation — Motor Vehicles Act Does Not Prohibit Two-Wheeler Transport. Court holds that the absence of a state policy for bike taxis does not render the service illegal, and...