Search Results for "306"

1403 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1403 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging MIDC Plot Allotments — No Arbitrariness Found in Allotment Process. Petitioner's claim for allotment based on alleged earmarking fails as no legal right established.

The petitioner, Vikrant Industries, a sole proprietorship, filed a writ petition under Articles 226, 14, and 19 of the Constitution of India challengi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Disqualification of Stent Manufacturer from Tender Process. Petitioner's Drug Eluting Stents, Approved by DCGI, Held Eligible for Supply Under Rajiv Gandhi Arogya Yojana.

The Petitioner, M/s. Vascular Concepts Ltd., a company manufacturing Drug Eluting Stents, filed a Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court challengi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notices Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Fresh Material. Reassessment Based on Mere Change of Opinion Without New Tangible Material is Invalid.

The petitioner, Debashu Services Private Limited, a private limited company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, is a regular assessee under the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Husband for Murder and Cruelty of Wife in Dowry-Related Case. Circumstantial Evidence of Demand for Money and Death by Poisoning Sufficient to Sustain Conviction Under Sections 498-A and 302 IPC.

The appellant, Prabhakar Shejul, was convicted by the trial court for offences under Sections 498-A and 302 of the Indian Penal Code for causing the d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Specific Performance Dispute. Court upholds arbitrator's discretion to deny specific performance and award damages instead, finding no grounds for interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Rolta India Ltd., challenged an arbitral award dated 8th December, 2010 under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996...