Search Results for "wrong rule"

5087 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5087 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Port Trust's Eviction Notices for Unauthorized Occupants. Held that lessees/licensees whose tenures expired and who continued in possession without consent are unauthorized occupants liable to eviction under the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963.

The judgment concerns a group of writ petitions filed by various entities who were originally lessees or licensees of land belonging to the Board of T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Domicile Requirement for MBBS Admission in State Quota. NEET-UG 2013 Rules Requiring SSC and HSC from Maharashtra Institution Are Valid and Not Ultra Vires Articles 14, 15, 21, 29(2) of the Constitution.

The petitioner, Shubham Gaddalay, a minor represented by his mother Dr. Sunanda Gaddalay, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Borrowers' Challenge Against DRT Orders Rejecting Interim Relief Despite Pending IBC Section 95 Petition. Interim Moratorium Under Section 96 IBC Bars Continuation of Securitisation Proceedings During Pendency of Insolvency Petition.

The petitioners, M/s. Kapole Advertising Agency and others, were the original borrowers who had approached the Bombay High Court challenging two order...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Minister's Order Canceling Cinema License for Lack of Jurisdiction and Non-Speaking Order. Appellate Authority Under Section 8A of Bombay Cinemas (Regulation) Act, 1953 Cannot Cancel License Without Recording Findings on Grounds Under Section 6.

The petitioners, Deepak Joshi and the legal representatives of Ravi K. Appu, challenged an order dated 28.01.1999 passed by the State Minister (Home),...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Amendment of Plaint in Civil Suit — Due Diligence Test Under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC Not Applicable Before Commencement of Trial. Trial Court Erred in Rejecting Amendment Application on Ground of Lack of Due Diligence When Trial Had Not Commenced.

The petitioners, plaintiffs in a civil suit (O.S. No. 188/2015) pending before the Additional Civil Judge and JMFC, Hungund, filed an application (IA ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal by Union of India in Army Dismissal Case Due to Procedural Irregularity. Summary Court Martial Conducted Without Following Mandatory Procedure Under Army Rules 22-24 and Section 80 of Army Act, 1950 Renders Dismissal Void.

The Union of India, Ministry of Defence, and other appellants challenged an order dated 5th September 2001 passed by a learned Single Judge of the Kar...