Search Results for "take notice"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "take notice"

17204 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 17204 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Habeas Corpus Petition Challenging Preventive Detention under Goonda Act – Allegations of Non-Supply of Documents and Procedural Violations. Detenu Contends That Order Lacks Subjective Satisfaction and Fails to Comply with Section 10 and Section 3(2) Proviso of the Karnataka Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1985.

14 Aug 2025

The writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India was filed by the wife of the detenu, Md. Rustum Ahmed @ Rustum, challenging ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Rehears Criminal Appeals Against Conviction for Murder and Robbery After Remand by Supreme Court. Conviction Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Recoveries Challenged Under Section 374(2) of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

15 Oct 2019

The matter originated from the murder of Smt. Chukibai, a 68-year-old pawnbroker residing alone at Chamarajpet, Bengaluru. On 12.05.1991, accused No.1...

High Court

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arrest of Vessel in Admiralty Suit for Lack of Maritime Claim — Charterer's Claim for Sub-Charterer's Expenses Not a Maritime Lien. The court held that a claim for damages arising from a sub-charterer's expenses due to arrest of the chartered vessel by a third party does not constitute a maritime claim under the Admiralty Act, 2017, and the vessel cannot be arrested for such a claim.

6 Jun 2016

The case involves a Notice of Motion filed by the Applicant, the owner of the vessel M.V. AODABAO (Defendant No. 1), seeking to vacate the order of ar...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition in Cheque Bounce Case — Conviction Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Upheld. Presumption of Legally Enforceable Debt Under Section 139 NI Act Not Rebutted by Accused.

12 Nov 2019

The petitioners, accused Nos.1 and 2, were convicted by the LVII Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Mayo Hall unit, Bengaluru in C.C.No.53439/2...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Upholds Rejection of Amendment to Written Statement in Eviction Suit; No Due Diligence Shown After Commencement of Trial. Tenant's Application to Add Waiver Plea Based on Municipal Tax Payments Fails Under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC as Knowledge of Tax Payments Existed Throughout.

20 Oct 2006

The matter arose from a suit for eviction and mesne profits filed by the landlord against the tenant in the Small Causes Court at Mumbai. The landlord...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in Murder Case Under Section 302/149 IPC. Common Object to Forcible Possession Extended to Meeting All Eventualities Including Death, and Knowledge of Lethal Weapon by Assembly Members is Implied from Conduct.

18 Dec 1958

The case arose from an incident where five individuals, including the appellants, went to take forcible possession of a field cultivatorily possessed ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148-A of Income Tax Act, 1961 — Internal Audit Objection Constitutes Change of Opinion. Notice Issued Beyond Three Years Based on Audit Objection Without Fresh Material Held Invalid as It Amounts to Mere Change of Opinion.

30 Jul 2024

The petitioner, Shri Dilip Laximan Powar, a paralyzed individual represented by his wife, runs a hardware and paint retail business as a proprietorshi...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Refund Recovery Case - Clarifies No Separate Section 11A Notice Required When Refund Order Reviewed Under Section 35E. Recovery of erroneous refund granted through speaking order reviewed under Section 35E of Central Excise Act, 1944 does not require separate show cause notice under Section 11A, as Sections 35E and 11A operate in different fields with different purposes and time limits.

24 Mar 2023

The dispute originated from the respondent company's manufacture of cotton yarn consumed captively in its composite mills for weaving fabric. Followin...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening of Assessment Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Fresh Material — Petitioner Had Disclosed All Facts in Original Assessment Under Section 143(3).

13 Mar 2023

The petitioner, Milton Plastics Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging a notice dated 22.03.2004 is...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Blacklisting Orders Against Two Firms in WCL Tender Dispute — Lack of Opportunity of Hearing Violates Principles of Natural Justice. The court held that blacklisting a contractor without prior notice and hearing is arbitrary and unsustainable under Article 14 of the Constitution.

30 Nov 2023

The petitioners, M/s H.D. Enterprises (HDE) and M/s Gaurav Contracts Company (GCC), had entered into a joint venture/consortium agreement on 23.05.201...

104 105 106 107 108

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)