Search Results for "settlement stay"

1183 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1183 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Petitions by Cab Company Against Drivers, Appoints Sole Arbitrator. Arbitration clause in Driver Agreement survives termination under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Meru Cab Company Private Limited, filed four arbitration petitions under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, see...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Revocation of Leave Under Clause XII of Letters Patent Act in Arbitration Petition. Court Holds That Cause of Action for Section 9 Petition Arises Where Arbitration Agreement Is Situated, Not Where Interim Relief Is Sought.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court, who allowed Chamber Summons No. 905 of 2013 filed by Respondent...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging DRAT Order Setting Aside DRT's Reference to Arbitration in Bank Recovery Suit. Debt Recovery Tribunal Has Exclusive Jurisdiction Under RDDB Act, 1993, and Arbitration Clause Cannot Oust It.

The Bombay High Court dismissed a writ petition filed by Harvestdeal Securities Ltd. challenging an order of the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRA...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging DRAT Order Setting Aside DRT's Reference to Arbitration in Bank Recovery Suit. Arbitration Clause Does Not Oust Jurisdiction of DRT Under Section 19 of Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993.

The petitioner, Harvestdeal Securities Ltd., challenged an order of the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT) dated 19 February 2015, which set asid...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Section 34 Application in MSMED Act Arbitration. Court Holds That Section 34 Application Is Maintainable and Limitation Period Under Section 34(3) Applies.

The appellant, M/s. Ravindranath GE Medicate Associate Private Limited, issued a work order dated 9th January 2008 to the respondent, M/s. Clean Coats...