High Court of Bombay Hears Batch of Income Tax Appeals Filed by Revenue — Court Notes Service of Notices and Delay in Filing of Appeals. Proceedings Adjourned; Interim Applications Pending.
26 Nov 2025...
Search Results for "revenue income"
2782 result(s) found
Found 2782 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Trade Circulars Restricting CST Exemption to Registered Dealers. State Government Cannot Grant Exemption for Inter-State Sales to Unregistered Dealers Under Section 8(5) of Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 After 2002 Amendment.
30 Aug 2012The petitioners, Prism Cement Limited and its shareholder/director, filed a writ petition challenging three trade circulars issued by the Commissioner...
- 85
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Slum Rehabilitation Society in Petition Challenging Notification Subjecting Slum Scheme to Permission Under Maharashtra Restoration of Land to Scheduled Tribe Act, 1974. Slum Act Prevails Over Restoration Act and Section 36A of MLR Code; No Prior Permission Needed Under Restoration Act for Slum Rehabilitation Scheme on Tribal Land.
28 Jul 2016The petitioners, a proposed co-operative housing society of slum dwellers and its chief promoter, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Const...
- 58
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Income Tax Order for Not Giving Effect to ITAT Directions — Refund of Rs. 40,06,299/- Ordered. The impugned order failed to correctly implement the ITAT's order and erroneously computed tax liability, leading to a direction for fresh computation and refund.
20 Feb 2024The petitioner, Ayyappa Seva Samgham Bombay, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court challen...
- 73
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening of Assessment Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Lack of Fresh Material. Reassessment Based on Mere Change of Opinion on Allowability of Deduction and Depreciation Rate is Invalid.
8 Mar 2010The petitioner, Aventis Pharma Ltd., challenged a notice dated 16th March 2009 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, seeking to reopen...
- 60
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Income Tax Case — Section 249(4) of Income Tax Act, 1961, is Directory, Not Mandatory. Non-Payment of Self-Assessment Tax at Time of Filing Appeal Does Not Bar Appeal if Tax Paid Before Hearing.
27 Sep 2010The case involves an appeal by Shri Bharatkumar Sakhsaria against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 31-10-2001, which held his appe...
- 55
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case — Prima Facie Adjustment Under Section 143(1)(a) Cannot Include Provision for Doubtful Debt. The ITAT was right in holding that adjustment for provision for doubtful debt is outside the ambit of prima facie adjustment under Section 143(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
28 Jun 2011The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Income Tax against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) which deleted a prima faci...
- 105
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Rectification Application Despite Pending Appeal in Income Tax Case — Mistake Apparent on Record Regarding Advance Tax Credit. The Court held that the power to rectify under Section 154 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is independent and can be exercised even if an appeal is pending on the same issue.
4 Sep 2019The Petitioner, Piramal Investment Opportunities Fund, filed its return of income for Assessment Year 2015-16 on 8 October 2015, disclosing total inco...
- 125
High Court
Bombay High Court Partly Allows Appeal and Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Negligent Driving of Taxi. Deceased was a passenger in taxi that dashed against stationary ST bus; court held that contributory negligence of ST bus driver not established and awarded enhanced compensation under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
18 Aug 2017The appeal was filed by the widow and sons of the deceased Bhayyalalsing Rajput, who died in a motor vehicle accident on 12.2.2001. The accident occur...
- 54
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Specific Performance of Property Sale Agreement Due to Plaintiffs' Default and Unauthorized Payments. Plaintiffs Failed to Pay Balance Consideration Within Stipulated 10-Month Period and Dealt with Sole Director Contrary to Board Resolution Requiring Joint Action.
7 May 2010The suit was filed by the plaintiffs, Pankaj Anantrai Bhuwa & others, against the defendant, M/s. Ramkumar Shivchandray & Sons, seeking specific perfo...
- 23
