High Court of Judicature at Bombay Disposes of Writ Petition (L) No. 30829 of 2024. The petition involved multiple parties including the State of Maharashtra and several private respondents.
8 May 2025...
Search Results for "Supreme Court discretionary power"
1834 result(s) found
Found 1834 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Partnership Dispute Over Country Liquor License — Minister's Order Quashed for Violation of Natural Justice. The Minister under Section 138 of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949, deleted the appellant's name from the license without hearing, violating principles of natural justice.
27 Jul 2017The case involves an inter se dispute between two partners, Girijashankar Balaji Jaiswal and Shriram Bhaiyalal Jaiswal, over a Country Liquor License ...
- 115
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Import Licence Case Due to Unexplained Delay in Filing Writ Petition. Delay of Nearly Two Years Without Satisfactory Explanation Bars Mandamus Relief Under Article 226 of Constitution of India.
22 Nov 1968The Supreme Court dismissed an appeal against the Punjab High Court's order dismissing in limine a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Consti...
- 56
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Ban Order Against Contractor in ONGC Project Delay Dispute — Violation of Natural Justice. Internal Enquiry Report Not Shared With Contractor Before Imposing Business Ban, Rendering Order Arbitrary and Unreasonable.
8 Aug 2016The petitioner, Sarku Engineering Services SDN BHD, a Malaysian company, challenged an order dated 4 January 2016 issued by respondent No.2, Oil and N...
- 151
High Court
Bombay High Court Partially Allows Appeal Against Arbitral Tribunal's Interim Order in Development Dispute — Upholds Disclosure Directions but Sets Aside Deposit Orders. The court held that while disclosure orders are permissible under Section 17 of the Arbitration Act, a direction to deposit 30% of sale proceeds without a finding of likelihood of dissipation of assets is not sustainable.
17 Dec 2024The petitioners, Arun Bhoomi Corporation and Vijay Kanhaiyalal Joshi, filed a Commercial Arbitration Petition under Section 37 of the Arbitration and ...
- 471
High Court
Bombay High Court Condemns Police for Illegal Detention of Senior Citizens in Domestic Violence Case — Violation of Article 21 of Constitution of India. Police Detention of Senior Citizens Without Warrant Held Unconstitutional Under Article 21.
21 Dec 2012The Bombay High Court dealt with a criminal writ petition filed by five petitioners, including Niraj Ramesh Jariwala, his parents (Ramesh Vitthaldas J...
- 104
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Sets Aside Condonation of Delay by State in Filing Second Appeal — Emphasizes Need for Sufficient Cause and Due Diligence. The Court held that the State cannot claim any undue indulgence in matters of limitation and must act with due diligence; mere reference to COVID-19 is insufficient to condone inordinate delay of 1537 days.
12 Dec 2024The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Inder Singh against the order of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh condoning the delay of 1537 days in fi...
- 1178
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Modifies Relief in Industrial Dispute from Reinstatement to Compensation. Termination Based on Security Report Did Not Justify Reinstatement; High Court Erred in Upholding Tribunal's Discretionary Order Without Interference.
18 Dec 1969The case arose out of a reference to the Industrial Tribunal concerning the termination of service of A. K. Roy, a skilled workman employed by Hindust...
- 56
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Order Disposing Impleadment Application as Infructuous in Suit for Recovery of Money and Declaration of Title. Appellant's claim for impleadment based on alleged agreement to sell was not pressed as the suit had been decreed and execution proceedings were pending.
4 Jun 2019The appeal arose from an order dated 18th January 2019 passed by the learned Single Judge in Chamber Summons No. 1280 of 2018 in Suit No. 461 of 2010....
- 22
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Upholds Family Court Order Allowing Reopening of Evidence in Nullity of Marriage Petition — Order XVIII Rule 17 CPC Permits Recall/Re-examination at Any Stage Before Judgment to Prevent Failure of Justice.
29 Apr 2026The petitioner-husband filed a petition under Sections 11 and 12 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, seeking a decree of nullity of marriage against the ...
- 77
