Karnataka High Court Hears Batch of Petitions Seeking to Quash Private Complaint and FIR for Offences Under Sections 354A, 500, 506, 120B IPC. Multiple Accused Challenge the Proceedings as Abuse of Process of Law.
9 Aug 2024...
Search Results for "State Chief Information Commissioner"
1876 result(s) found
Found 1876 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Directs Effective Implementation of Tree Protection Act in Pune - Mandates Constitution of Tree Authority with NGO Representatives and Appointment of Adequate Tree Officers. The court held that the Tree Authority must include non-official members with expertise, and compensatory plantation of 10 trees per tree cut is mandatory under Section 8 of the Maharashtra (Urban Areas) Protection and Preservation of Trees Act, 1975.
20 Sep 2013This Public Interest Litigation was filed by Deepak Balkrishna Vahikar and another petitioner seeking effective implementation of the Maharashtra (Urb...
- 150
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Refers Question of Law on Allowability of Expenditure under Section 40(a)(i) and Section 172 of Income Tax Act to Larger Bench. Disagreement with earlier Division Bench decision in CIT v. Orient (Goa) Pvt. Ltd. leads to referral on whether payer's non-resident status required for invoking proviso to Section 172.
5 Feb 2016Background: The case concerns income tax appeals filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the order of the Income ...
- 58
High Court
High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru Examines Challenge to Advocate General’s Refusal of Consent for Criminal Contempt Proceedings Under Section 15(1)(b) of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. Writ Petition Filed Under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution Alleges Non-Application of Mind and Abuse of Process of Court by Respondents in Property Dispute.
18 Sep 2019The writ petition arises from a property dispute concerning Sy.No.200/2 at Kudlu Village, Bengaluru. The petitioner, H. Munireddy, alleged that respon...
- 83
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Inordinate Delay in Considering Representation — Right to Make Effective Representation Violated Under Article 22(5) of Constitution. The court held that the failure to consider the detenu's representation expeditiously renders the continued detention illegal, emphasizing the constitutional safeguard under Article 22(5) of the Constitution of India.
30 Jul 2014The petitioner, Ashish Robert Felix, was detained under Section 3(1) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, ...
- 105
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act Due to Unexplained Seven-Month Delay in Execution and Absence of Public Order Disturbance. The Court held that the detaining authority failed to explain the prolonged delay in executing the detention order and that the alleged incidents affected individuals, not the public at large, thus not amounting to disturbance of public order under Section 3(2) of the MPDA Act.
16 Sep 2021Background: The matter arose from a preventive detention order dated 29.07.2020 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Nagpur City, under Section 3(2) ...
High Court
Madras High Court Considers Writ Petitions for Mandamus and Certiorari Regarding Street Vendors' Town Vending Committee Elections. Petitions Seek Enforcement of Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Act, 2014 and Associated Rules, and Challenge Election Notice for Procedural Irregularities.
7 Mar 2025The judgment involves three writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court. The...
- 139
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Order of Additional Divisional Commissioner in Village Panchayat Disqualification Case for Want of Reasons; Holds Cryptic Order Arbitrary. Quasi-Judicial Authority's Order Setting Aside Collector's Decision Without Recording Reasons Violates Principles of Natural Justice and Is Unsustainable.
12 Sep 2018The dispute arose from a disqualification proceeding initiated against the petitioner, a former Sarpanch of Village Panchayat Lohgaon. The petitioner ...
- 105
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds CAT Order Reinstating Suspended Police Officer Due to Non-Review Under Rule 3(8) of All India Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1969. Continued suspension beyond 90 days without mandatory review renders suspension illegal and without authority of law.
6 Jan 2012The State of Maharashtra and the Director General of Police filed a Writ Petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging ...
- 192
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Orders Under COFEPOSA for Lack of Proximity and Non-Application of Mind. Detention orders set aside as the detenus were not directly involved in smuggling and the detaining authority failed to consider less drastic alternatives.
24 Jan 2014The Bombay High Court, by a judgment dated 24 January 2014, allowed two criminal writ petitions challenging preventive detention orders passed under S...
- 156
