Search Results for "Standing Orders Act"

3380 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3380 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Two Regular First Appeals Under Section 96 CPC Against Common Judgment in Suits for Declaration, Injunction, Partition, and Dissolution of Partnership — Property Dispute Involving Sites in Mysore and Bangalore

The Regular First Appeals RFA No.37/2003 and RFA No.84/2003 were filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the common j...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Labour Court Order Declaring Transfer of Employees as Illegal Change Under Bombay Industrial Relations Act. Transfer from Polyester Department to Spurn Yarn Department Without Notice of Change Violates Section 42 Read with Schedule II Items 1,2,4,5 of BIR Act.

The petitioner, Indorama Synthetics (I) Ltd., filed a writ petition challenging the judgment and order dated 5 December 2006 passed by the Labour Cour...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Writ Petition Nos.4936, 6015, 6514 & 6795 of 2025 &

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Nagpur Bench Confirms Death Sentence and Dismisses Appeals in Triple Murder Case. Murder Conviction Under Section 302 IPC Upheld Based on Eyewitness Testimony and Medical Evidence.

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, heard a Criminal Confirmation Case along with three criminal appeals arising from the judgment a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Bail to Developer in Consumer Execution Proceedings for Non-Compliance of Refund Order. Held that Section 27 of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 is penal in nature and bail should be granted liberally unless there is likelihood of abscondence or tampering with evidence.

The petitioner, Suhas Ratnakar Morey, a developer, was involved in a consumer dispute with the respondent, Dhanraj Tulshiram Khaparde, who had paid Rs...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Dismissed Bank Peon — Reinstatement Order Set Aside for Non-Consideration of Employer's Application Under Section 42(4) Proviso of Bombay Industrial Relations Act. Industrial Court's Remand Order Upheld as Labour Court Failed to Address Statutory Compliance.

The petitioner, Chandrakant D. Teravkar, was employed as a peon with the North Kanara GSB Co-op. Bank Ltd. (respondent no.1). He was charge-sheeted on...