Search Results for "Separate land compensation"

1245 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1245 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed. Agreement for Sale Contained Contradictory Clauses Regarding Time for Performance, and Plaintiff Failed to Prove Readiness and Willingness.

The appellant (plaintiff) filed a Second Appeal against the concurrent dismissal of his suit for specific performance of an agreement for sale of a pl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Building Construction in Cessed Building Area — No Violation of DCR Found. Petitioner failed to establish that the construction violated Development Control Regulations or that the building was a cessed building under MHADA.

The petitioner, Asif Abdul Sattar, filed a Public Interest Litigation before the Bombay High Court challenging the construction of a building by Respo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Consumer Forum Order Against Credit Society for Deficiency in Service. Fixed Deposit Holder is a Consumer Under Section 2(1) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

The petitioners, including the Kala Hanuman Urban Credit Society and its directors, challenged an order dated 25 February 2009 passed by the District ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Declaration Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Suit for declaration of joint ownership and compensation decreed in part; no substantial question of law arises.

The appellant, Smt. Subadhramma, was the defendant No.3 in O.S. No.226/2011 on the file of the I Addl. Civil Judge, Bellary. The suit was filed by the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Challenge by KHB Employees to Disciplinary Proceedings Initiated by State Government. Entrustment of Inquiry to Lokayukta Under Rule 14A of CCA Rules Questioned on Ground of Lack of Jurisdiction Over Non-Government Servants.

The dispute arose from disciplinary proceedings initiated against the petitioners, who were employees of the Karnataka Housing Board (KHB), serving as...