Search Results for "subsequent act"

13216 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 13216 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Bank's Illegal Dispossession of Auction Purchaser. Petitioner Purchased Flat in 2017 Auction by SBI, but Was Forcibly Evicted by Saraswat Bank in 2025 Without Due Process.

The petitioners, Mariyam Rangwala and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court at Bo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Validity of Forward Contract Prohibition; Contracts Void Under Section 3 of Travancore-Cochin Public Safety Measures Act 5 of 1950. Pre-Constitution Bill Did Not Require President’s Sanction Under Article 304(b) as No Amendment Covered by Article Was Moved.

The dispute arose from forward contracts for the purchase of coconut oil entered into in 1952 in the former Cochin State. The respondent, a commission...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Order in MVAT Case Due to Limitation and Lack of Natural Justice. Inter-State Stock Transfer Not a Sale Under MVAT Act, 2002; Reassessment Beyond 4-Year Limitation Period Invalid.

The petitioner, M/s. United Spirits Limited, a company engaged in the manufacture and sale of alcoholic beverages, filed a writ petition challenging a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

COMPANY APPEAL NOS. 1 to 7 of 2015

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Considers Writ Petition Against Industrial Tribunal Award. Award Directed Reinstatement of Workman Dismissed During Conciliation as Void Under Section 33(1)(a) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The dispute arose from the charge-sheet issued on 28 January 1997 by M/s. Gulf Air to its employee Vinod Malhotra, a Passenger Service Supervisor and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Demolition of Temple and Construction of Commercial Complex. Petitioners Failed to Establish Temple as Protected Monument Under Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958.

The petitioners, residents of Vaidya Wadi, Mumbai, filed a Public Interest Litigation challenging the demolition of a temple dedicated to Lord Hanuman...