Search Results for "prior representation"

3317 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3317 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Disciplinary Proceedings Initiated After Retirement. Disciplinary proceedings cannot be initiated after an employee's retirement unless permitted by statutory rules or pension regulations.

The petitioner, a Civil Engineer employed with the Ahmednagar Municipal Corporation, was issued a show cause notice on 30.3.2007, just before his reti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Concurrent Findings of Readiness and Willingness Upheld. Agreement to Sell for Rs. 1,10,000 with Rs. 1,000 Earnest Money; Plaintiff Proved Continuous Readiness and Willingness to Perform.

The case involves a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell agricultural land. The plaintiffs (respondents) entered into an agreement wi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark and Copyright Infringement Suit Over 'SUKOON' Mark for Ayurvedic Massage Oil. Plaintiff's Prior Use Since 1993 and Distinctive Label Establish Prima Facie Case for Injunction Against Defendant's Identical Mark.

The plaintiff, Shafeeque Ahmed Mohammad Sayeed, trading as M/s. Nageena Ayurvedic Pharmacy, filed a suit against the defendant, Ansari Bilal Ahmadlal ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Election Petition Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC for Insufficient Pleadings. Petition Failed to Plead Material Facts on Alleged Corrupt Practice and Non-Compliance Under Sections 100(1)(b) and 100(1)(d)(iv) of Representation of the People Act, 1951, Leading to Lack of Cause of Action.

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay heard an Election Petition filed by the losing candidate challenging the election victory of the returned candi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Advocate's Re-Enrollment After Surrender of Sanad During COVID-19. Karnataka Advocates' Welfare Fund Act, 1983 Does Not Bar Re-Entry; Right to Practice Under Article 19(1)(g) Upheld.

The petitioner, Shri Channabasappa Lingappa Mokhashi, enrolled as an advocate with the then Mysore Bar Council on 17-07-1973 and practiced continuousl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Property Tax Demand for Period Prior to Completion of Construction in Mysuru City Corporation. Property tax under the Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976 can only be levied from the date of completion of building, not from the date of approval of plan.

The petitioner, M/s B M Habitat, a partnership firm represented by its partner Deepak Lulla, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Teacher's Petition for Higher Grade Pay Scales and Service Benefits. Court directs recalculation of retirement dues and arrears with interest at 6% per annum.

The petitioner, Lalabhai Khanabhai Parmar, a retired primary teacher, filed a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Gujar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Upholds Disciplinary Action Against Chartered Accountant for Professional Misconduct in Bank Audit. Failure to Report Irregular Loans and Deficient Documentation Constitutes Negligence Under Section 21(5) of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949.

This is a case reference under Section 21(5) of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, arising from a complaint by Smt. Prabha S. Prasad, General Manage...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Discharge in Cheque Dishonour Case — Prima Facie Case Made Out Under Section 138 NI Act. No Interference Warranted as Magistrate's Order Based on Material Evidence.

The present criminal revision application was filed by Yogesh Premjibhai Suvariya and another (the petitioners/accused) challenging the order dated 08...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Due to Non-Application of Mind and Unexplained Delay. Failure to Consider Retraction of Statement and Delay of Over 11 Months in Passing Order Vitiate Subjective Satisfaction Under Section 3(1)(i) of COFEPOSA Act, 1976.

The petitioner, Gaurav Kanak Jain, challenged a detention order dated 21st November 2016 passed under Section 3(1)(i) of the Conservation of Foreign E...