Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark and Copyright Infringement Suit Over 'SUKOON' Mark for Ayurvedic Massage Oil. Plaintiff's Prior Use Since 1993 and Distinctive Label Establish Prima Facie Case for Injunction Against Defendant's Identical Mark.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 93
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The plaintiff, Shafeeque Ahmed Mohammad Sayeed, trading as M/s. Nageena Ayurvedic Pharmacy, filed a suit against the defendant, Ansari Bilal Ahmadlal Mohd., trading as JBM Herbal Pharmacy, seeking injunctive relief for trademark infringement, copyright infringement, and passing off. The dispute concerns the mark 'SUKOON' used for ayurvedic massage oil. The plaintiff has used this mark since 1993 and holds label mark registrations for 'SUKOON OIL' under Nos. 1421905 (Class 3) and 1377947 (Class 5). The plaintiff also claims copyright in the artistic work of the label. The defendant also uses the mark 'SUKOON' for similar products. The court considered the plaintiff's prior use, the distinctiveness of the label, and the likelihood of confusion. The defendant argued that 'SUKOON' is generic and descriptive. The court found that the plaintiff had made out a prima facie case, the balance of convenience was in favor of the plaintiff, and irreparable injury would be caused if the injunction was not granted. Accordingly, the court granted an interim injunction restraining the defendant from using the mark 'SUKOON' or any deceptively similar mark pending disposal of the suit.

Headnote

A) Trademark Law - Infringement - Interim Injunction - Trade Marks Act, 1999, Sections 28, 29 - Plaintiff's label mark registration for 'SUKOON OIL' does not confer exclusive right over the word 'SUKOON' per se, but the court considers prior use and likelihood of confusion - Held that the plaintiff has made out a prima facie case for injunction due to extensive prior use since 1993 and deceptive similarity (Paras 1-10).

B) Copyright Law - Artistic Work - Infringement - Copyright Act, 1957, Section 14 - Plaintiff claims copyright in label artwork featuring 'SUKOON' - The court examines whether the label is an original artistic work and whether defendant's label is a substantial reproduction - Held that the plaintiff's label is distinctive and the defendant's label is deceptively similar, supporting a case for copyright infringement (Paras 4-6).

C) Passing Off - Common Law Remedy - Goodwill and Reputation - Plaintiff has used 'SUKOON' mark since 1993 for massage oil, building substantial goodwill - Defendant's adoption of identical mark for identical goods is likely to cause confusion and damage plaintiff's reputation - Held that the balance of convenience favors the plaintiff and an interim injunction is granted (Paras 7-10).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the plaintiff is entitled to an interim injunction restraining the defendant from using the mark 'SUKOON' for massage oil products, pending trial, in a suit for trademark infringement, copyright infringement, and passing off.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the Notice of Motion and granted an interim injunction restraining the defendant from using the mark 'SUKOON' or any deceptively similar mark in relation to massage oil or any other goods, pending disposal of the suit.

Law Points

  • Trademark infringement
  • copyright infringement
  • passing off
  • interim injunction
  • descriptive mark
  • generic mark
  • prior use
  • label mark registration
  • artistic work copyright
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2016:BHC-OS:15613

Notice of Motion (L) No. 2311 of 2016 in Suit (L) No. 810 of 2016

2016-10-26

G.S. Patel, J.

2016:BHC-OS:15613

Mr. Alankar Kirpekar with Mr. Murlidhar Khadilkar, Ms. Jaya Manghwani, Mr. Shekhar Bhagat & Mr. Aakash Joshi for Plaintiff; Mr. Dipesh Siroya for Defendant

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil suit for trademark infringement, copyright infringement, and passing off seeking interim injunctive relief.

Remedy Sought

Plaintiff seeks an interim injunction restraining the defendant from using the mark 'SUKOON' or any deceptively similar mark in relation to massage oil products.

Filing Reason

The defendant adopted the identical mark 'SUKOON' for similar ayurvedic massage oil products, causing confusion and infringing the plaintiff's trademark and copyright.

Issues

Whether the plaintiff has a prima facie case for trademark infringement despite having only a label mark registration for 'SUKOON OIL' and not a word mark for 'SUKOON'. Whether the plaintiff's label qualifies as an artistic work under the Copyright Act, 1957, and whether the defendant's label infringes that copyright. Whether the plaintiff has established goodwill and reputation in the mark 'SUKOON' to succeed in a passing off action.

Submissions/Arguments

Plaintiff argued that he has used the mark 'SUKOON' since 1993, has label mark registrations, and copyright in the label artwork; the defendant's adoption of identical mark is dishonest and causes confusion. Defendant argued that 'SUKOON' is generic and descriptive, widely used by many others, and the plaintiff cannot claim exclusivity over it.

Ratio Decidendi

The plaintiff's prior use of the mark 'SUKOON' since 1993, combined with label mark registrations and copyright in the distinctive label, establishes a prima facie case for trademark infringement and passing off. The balance of convenience favors the plaintiff, and irreparable injury would result if the injunction is not granted.

Judgment Excerpts

The Plaintiff manufactures and markets ayurvedic medicines. He has, for many years, used the trading style M/s. Nageena Ayurvedic Pharmacy. The dispute between them is over the mark SUKOON. The Plaintiff does not have registration of SUKOON as a word mark. What he does have is registration of a label mark SUKOON OIL under No. 1421905 in Class 03 and another registration No. 1377947 in Class 05.

Procedural History

The plaintiff filed Suit (L) No. 810 of 2016 along with Notice of Motion (L) No. 2311 of 2016 seeking interim injunctive relief. The motion was heard by the High Court of Bombay on multiple occasions and disposed of by this judgment on 26th October 2016.

Acts & Sections

  • Trade Marks Act, 1999: 28, 29
  • Copyright Act, 1957: 14
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Caste Certificate Invalidation and Termination Order in Muslim Julaha OBC Case — Vigilance Report Supporting Claim Ignored. The court held that the Scrutiny Committee must follow the vigilance report and cannot invalidate ...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark and Copyright Infringement Suit Over 'SUKOON' Mark for Ayurvedic Massage Oil. Plaintiff's Prior Use Since 1993 and Distinctive Label Establish Prima Facie Case for Injunction Against Defendant'...