Search Results for "joint names"

1890 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1890 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Sugar Mills' Challenge to Cess Notification on Sugarcane. State Notification Under Section 3 of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce (Development and Regulation) Act, 1965 Held Ultra Vires Due to Repugnancy with Sugarcane (Control) Order, 1966 Under Essential Commodities Act, 1955.

The petitioners, seven sugar mills in Maharashtra, challenged a Government notification dated 22.3.2018 issued under Section 3 of the Maharashtra Agri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Arbitration Petition Challenging Award on Share Sale Proceeds. Court upholds arbitrator's finding that petitioner signed mandate letter for sale of shares and loan repayment, rejecting allegations of fraud and forgery.

The petitioner, Jackie Kukubhai Shroff, and the respondent, Ratnam Sudesh Iyer, were shareholders in Atlas Equipfin Pvt. Ltd. (Atlas), which held shar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Provident Fund Nomination Dispute — Nominee Entitled to Receive Amount as Trustee for Heirs. Joint Nomination Creates Co-Trusteeship Under Employees' Provident Funds Act, 1952.

The appellant, Antonio Joao Fernandes, filed a suit claiming 50% of the provident fund amount of his deceased cousin Joazinho Dias, who had nominated ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Dowry Death Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Demand for Dowry and Inconsistencies in Prosecution Case. Conviction under Sections 304-B, 498-A IPC and Sections 3, 4, 6 of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 set aside as prosecution failed to prove dowry demand soon before death.

The case pertains to the death of Shaheen, who was married to Abdul Aziz (accused No. 2) on 12th April 1996. After marriage, she resided with her husb...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal of Plaintiffs in Tenancy Dispute — Plaintiffs Fail to Prove Tenancy Rights. Court holds that mere possession or payment of rent does not establish tenancy without proof of lawful transfer or succession under the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999.

The case involves a dispute over a room (suit premises) allotted in lieu of an earlier tenanted room in a chawl at Mahim, Mumbai. The plaintiffs, Sulo...