Search Results for "advance purchase"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "advance purchase"

1292 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1292 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Interim Injunction Application in Redevelopment Dispute and Holds Civil Suit Not Barred by Section 91 of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. Developer's Claim for Specific Performance of Development Agreement Against Co-operative Housing Society Held Maintainable as Developer Is Not a Member Under Section 91, and Transaction Not Subject to Restrictions Under Sections 43, 44, or 45.

13 Jul 2016

The suit was filed by a partnership firm of developers, Maya Developers, against the Azad Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. and its members, seeking s...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Transportation Contract Dispute — Unilateral Rate Reduction Not Basis for Invoking Performance Bank Guarantees. Contractor's Refusal to Execute Work Orders Held Justified When Principal Unjustifiably Withheld Agreed Freight Rates Under Clause 3.3 of Contract.

21 Apr 2015

The petitioner, a transport contractor, entered into a contract with the respondent Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. for transportation of materials...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Considers Challenge to Arbitral Award in Construction Subcontract Dispute. Petition filed by main contractor against subcontractor's award under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

21 Mar 2013

Patel Engineering Co. Ltd (PEC) challenged an arbitral award dated 25 January 2010 under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 in t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment to Implead Subsequent Purchasers in Suit for Declaration of Purchase Right. Civil Procedure Code Order 1 Rule 10 Requires Impleading of Necessary Parties to Avoid Multiplicity of Proceedings.

9 Jun 2005

The writ petition before the Bombay High Court at Goa challenged an order of the trial court rejecting an application for amendment of plaint to imple...

High Court

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Challenge to Arbitral Award in Slum Redevelopment Agreement Dispute. Petitioner Seeks Setting Aside of Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

13 Sep 2019

...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Considers Interim Relief in Housing Society's Suit for Conveyance and Challenging Construction Approvals. The Court Was Hearing a Notice of Motion and an Appeal from Order Regarding Alleged Unauthorized Construction and Failure to Execute Conveyance Under MOFA.

7 Sep 2012

The judgment text provided is truncated and does not include the court's analysis or final decision. From the available text, the High Court was heari...

High Court

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Award in Joint Venture Dispute. Petition Seeks Enforcement Under Section 48 of Arbitration Act; Allegations Include Breach of JVA and Conflict of Interest.

7 Jan 2019

The petitioner, an Italian company engaged in cable manufacturing, entered into a Joint Venture Agreement dated 19th January 2010 with the respondents...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Timber Buyer's Claim for Uncut Logs After Vesting of Jagir. Property in Standing Timber Did Not Pass Before Severance Under Sale of Goods Act, 1930 Sections 18 and 21; Vesting Under Madhya Pradesh Abolition of Proprietary Rights Act, 1950 Extinguished Right to Cut Trees.

16 Sep 1969

The dispute arose from a timber sale contract executed on August 5, 1949 between Thakur Randhirshah, Jagirdar of Sonpur Jagir, and Ram Narain Mahto, a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue Appeal, Holds Mouth Freshener Classifiable Under Residuary Entry E1 of MVAT Act, Not as Spices. The court ruled that products made from spices through manufacture that become distinct commercial commodities, known as mouth fresheners, do not fall under the specific entry for 'spices of all varieties and forms' in Schedule C91, but are taxable at 12.5% under Entry E1.

18 Aug 2011

The case involved an appeal by the Revenue under Section 27 of the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 against a decision of the Maharashtra Sales T...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Preliminary Objection to Territorial Jurisdiction in FERA Appeals and Reserves Judgment on Maintainability. Court Examines Whether Appeals Under FERA Lie in Bombay High Court When Company's Registered Office and Principal Business Are in Bangalore, Despite Directors' Residence and Administrative Office in Mumbai.

12 Oct 2010

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay heard three appeals under the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 (FERA) filed by Hasmukh K Rawal, M/s. Mandl...

103 104 105 106 107

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)