Search Results for "additional district judge"

10334 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 10334 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Conversion Date in Execution of Foreign Currency Decrees Under Section 44-A CPC. Relevant Date for Conversion Held to Be Date of Foreign Decree, Not Date of Enforceability After Removal of Stay.

The appeals arose from execution proceedings to enforce foreign costs decrees obtained by the respondents (Ananda Bazar Patrika Limited and Aveek Sark...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010448052021_1

These Miscellaneous First Appeals were filed by the Assistant Executive Engineer of Visvesvaraya Jala Nigam Limited, the acquiring body, challenging t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Judgment on Appeals Against Conviction in S.C.No.122/2015; Conviction Under Sections 302 and 394 IPC Challenged by Accused.

The High Court of Karnataka, Kalaburagi Bench, considered three criminal appeals filed by convicted accused Nos. 1 to 3 against the judgment and order...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Appointment of Special Public Prosecutor in Sessions Case — No Bias Found. Professional acquaintance between prosecutor and victim does not disqualify appointment under Section 24 CrPC.

The petitioners, Shivaji Rajaram Take and Sharad Shivaji Take, are the original accused in Sessions Case No.12 of 2020 pending before the Additional S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Husband for Murder of Wife Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Last Seen Theory and Motive Established Chain of Circumstances Pointing to Guilt Under Section 302 IPC.

The case involves two appeals arising from the same judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad in Sessions Case No.191 of 2008. Criminal Ap...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Food Adulteration Case Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Sampling Procedure. Failure to Follow Section 11 of Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 and Rule 14 of PFA Rules Renders Conviction Unsustainable.

The petitioner, Sri. Syed Ahammed, was the accused in Criminal Case No.1022/2008 before the Civil Judge and JMFC, Sakaleshpura, for an offence under t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Additional Evidence in Appeal Against Order Refusing Revocation of Administrator. Order XLI Rule 27 CPC requires strict proof of due diligence for admitting additional evidence at appellate stage.

The case involves a Chamber Summons taken out by Ferani Hotels Pvt. Ltd. (the appellant) under Order XLI, Rule 27 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Insurance Appeals Challenging Tribunal Awards on Multiplier and Future Prospects; Decision Not Provided in Excerpt.

The Bombay High Court heard three first appeals filed by insurance companies challenging awards passed by Motor Accident Claims Tribunals. In First Ap...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Witness Testimony and Lack of Evidence. Acquittal of Accused Under Sections 302, 307 IPC and Section 27 Arms Act Upheld as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of the respondent-accused, Balu @ Balkrushna Gangadhar Chavan, in Sessions Case No. 92 of 1996...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Criminal Petition, Quashes Trial Court Order Rejecting Deferment of Cross-Examination Under Section 231(2) Cr.P.C. -- Accused in IPC Offences Including Section 302 Granted Relief to Prevent Prejudice in Defence Disclosure

The petitioners, accused in a sessions case involving grave offences under the IPC, sought deferment of cross-examination of witnesses under Section 2...